Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25664197›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics2015

Prevention of pelvic radiation disease.

Lorenzo Fuccio, Leonardo Frazzoni, Alessandra Guido

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Update on the management of the gastrointestinal effects of radiation.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Pelvic radiation disease: Updates on treatment options.World journal of clinical oncology · 2015
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lorenzo FuccioLorenzo Fuccio, Leonardo Frazzoni, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy.
Leonardo FrazzoniLorenzo Fuccio, Leonardo Frazzoni, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy.
Alessandra GuidoLorenzo Fuccio, Leonardo Frazzoni, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy.
IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic cancers are among the most frequently diagnosed cancers worldwide. Treatment of patients requires a multidisciplinary approach that frequently includes radiotherapy. Gastrointestinal (GI) radiation-induced toxicity is a major complication and the transient or long-term problems, ranging from mild to very severe, arising in non-cancerous tissues resulting from radiation treatment to a tumor of pelvic origin, are actually called as pelvic radiation disease. The incidence of pelvic radiation disease changes according to the radiation technique, the length of follow up, the assessment method, the type and stage of cancer and several other variables. Notably, even with the most recent radiation techniques, i.e., intensity-modulated radiotherapy, the incidence of radiation-induced GI side effects is overall reduced but still not negligible. In addition, radiation-induced GI side effects can develop even after several decades; therefore, the improvement of patient life expectancy will unavoidably increase the risk of developing radiation-induced complications. Once developed, the management of pelvic radiation disease may be challenging. Therefore, the prevention of radiation-induced toxicity represents a reasonable way to avoid a dramatic drop of the quality of life of these patients. In the current manuscript we provide an updated and practical review on the best available evidences in the field of the prevention of pelvic radiation disease.

Indexed as

AmifostineAminosalicylatesBeclomethasone dipropionateGastrointestinal toxicityMesalazineMisoprostolPelvic radiation diseaseProbiotics supplementationRadiotherapySucralfate

Identifiers

PMID25664197
PMCPMC4318744
OpenAlexW2317447792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.