ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2014
Effects of intrathecal anesthesia with different concentrations and doses on spinal cord, nerve roots and cerebrospinal fluid in dogs.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety of local anesthetics in cervical nerve root injections: a narrative review.Skeletal radiology · 2023Review
- The potencies and neurotoxicity of intrathecal levobupivacaine in a rat spinal model: Effects of concentration.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2023Article
- Ropivacaine inhibits proliferation, migration, and invasion while inducing apoptosis of glioma cells by regulating the SNHG16/miR-424-5p axis.Open life sciences · 2020Article
- Current and Future Issues in the Development of Spinal Agents for the Management of Pain.Current neuropharmacology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the effects of intrathecal anesthesia with bupivacaine, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine hydrochloride at different doses on the spinal cord, nerve roots and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in dogs.
methodsForty-two mongrel dogs were randomly divided into normal saline group (C; 2 ml), 0.5% (B1) and 0.75% (B2) bupivacaine hydrochloride groups (2 ml), 0.5% (L1) and 0.75% (L2) levobupivacaine hydrochloride group (2 ml), 0.5% (R1) and 0.75% (R2) ropivacaine hydrochloride group (2 ml), and drugs were intrathecally injected.
resultsThe contents of Ca(2+) and MDA and SOD activity of the spinal cord were comparable among groups (P > 0.05). In Groups B1, L1 and R1, the neuronal cytoplasm of spinal tissues was basically normal, the majority of mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum had complete structure, and the lamellar structure of modulated fibers was nearly normal. In Groups B2, L2 and R2, a small amount of mitochondrial vacuolar degeneration was found in the neuronal cytoplasm of spinal cord, but their structures were basically normal; the neural tissues exhibited focal mild edema, and most of the lamellar structure of modulated fibers and Schwann cells were nearly normal except for loose structure in several fibers and cells.
conclusionWhen compared with 0.75% anesthetics for local anesthesia, the early adverse effects on the ultrastructure of the spinal cord and nerve root reduce after focal anesthesia with 0.5% anesthetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25664046PMC4307493W2282950540What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.