Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25663722›Full record

ArticleAdvances in chemical physics

Modeling Viral Capsid Assembly.

Michael F Hagan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in chemical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Discovering optimal kinetic pathways for self-assembly using automatic differentiation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Limits of economy and fidelity for programmable assembly of size-controlled triply periodic polyhedra.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Hierarchical assembly is more robust than egalitarian assembly in synthetic capsids.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michael F HaganDepartment of Physics, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, 02454.

Funding

Computational modeling of viral capsid and bacterial microcompartment assemblyR01GM108021 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI HAGAN, MICHAEL F · 2013 to 2021
$2.7M
Multiscale modeling of mechanisms for viral capsid assembly and polymorphismR01AI080791 · NIAID · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI HAGAN, MICHAEL F · 2009 to 2013
$1.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI080791NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

I present a review of the theoretical and computational methodologies that have been used to model the assembly of viral capsids. I discuss the capabilities and limitations of approaches ranging from equilibrium continuum theories to molecular dynamics simulations, and I give an overview of some of the important conclusions about virus assembly that have resulted from these modeling efforts. Topics include the assembly of empty viral shells, assembly around single-stranded nucleic acids to form viral particles, and assembly around synthetic polymers or charged nanoparticles for nanotechnology or biomedical applications. I present some examples in which modeling efforts have promoted experimental breakthroughs, as well as directions in which the connection between modeling and experiment can be strengthened.

Identifiers

PMID25663722
PMCPMC4318123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.