Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25663688›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2015

Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopy vs open colectomy among nonmetastatic colon cancer patients: an analysis using the National Cancer Data Base.

Zhiyuan Zheng, Ahmedin Jemal, Chun Chieh Lin, Chung-Yuan Hu, George J Chang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Accelerated enhancedBMJ open · 2017
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Perioperative and oncological outcomes following robotic en bloc multivisceral resection for colorectal cancer.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Evidence in minimally invasive oncological surgery of the colon and rectum].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Observational
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhiyuan ZhengSurveillance and Health Services Research Program, Department of Intramural Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (ZZ, AJ, CCL); Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (CYH, GJC); Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Network and American College of Surgeons Clinical Research Program, Chicago, IL (GJC); Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Network and American College of Surgeons Clinical Research Program, Chicago, IL (GJC). jason.zheng@cancer.org.
Ahmedin JemalSurveillance and Health Services Research Program, Department of Intramural Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (ZZ, AJ, CCL); Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (CYH, GJC); Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Network and American College of Surgeons Clinical Research Program, Chicago, IL (GJC); Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Network and American College of Surgeons Clinical Research Program, Chicago, IL (GJC).
Chun Chieh LinSurveillance and Health Services Research Program, Department of Intramural Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (ZZ, AJ, CCL); Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (CYH, GJC); Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Network and American College of Surgeons Clinical Research Program, Chicago, IL (GJC); Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Network and American College of Surgeons Clinical Research Program, Chicago, IL (GJC).
Chung-Yuan HuSurveillance and Health Services Research Program, Department of Intramural Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (ZZ, AJ, CCL); Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (CYH, GJC); Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Network and American College of Surgeons Clinical Research Program, Chicago, IL (GJC); Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Network and American College of Surgeons Clinical Research Program, Chicago, IL (GJC).
George J ChangSurveillance and Health Services Research Program, Department of Intramural Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (ZZ, AJ, CCL); Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (CYH, GJC); Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Network and American College of Surgeons Clinical Research Program, Chicago, IL (GJC); Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Network and American College of Surgeons Clinical Research Program, Chicago, IL (GJC).
American Cancer Society · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Optimizing Treatment of Rectal Cancer Using a Markov Decision ModelK07CA133187 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI CHANG, GEORGE J · 2009 to 2013
$853k
NCI NIH HHS CA16672NCI NIH HHS K07-CA133187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRandomized clinical trials showed that laparoscopic colectomy (LC) is superior to open colectomy (OC) in short-term surgical outcomes; however, the generalizability among real-world patients is not clear.

methodsThe National Cancer Data Base was used to identify stage I-III colon cancer patients age 18 to 84 years in 2010 and 2011. A propensity score analysis with 1:1 matching (PS) was used to avoid the effect of treatment selection bias. Patients were clustered at the hospital level for multilevel regression analyses. The main outcomes measured were 30-day mortality, unplanned readmissions, length of stay (LOS), and initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy among stage III patients. All statistical tests were two-sided.

resultsA total of 45 876 patients were analyzed, 18 717 (41%) LC and 27 159 (59%) OC. After PS matching, there were 18 230 patients in both groups and they were well balanced on their covariables. Compared with OC, LC showed consistent benefits in 30-day mortality (1.3% vs 2.3 %, odds ratio [OR] = 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.49 to 0.69, P < .001) and LOS (median 5 vs 6 days, incident rate ratio = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.8 to 0.84, P < .001). LC was also associated with a higher rate of adjuvant chemotherapy use in stage III patients (72.3% vs 67.0%, P < .001). LC was more likely to be performed by high-volume surgeons in high-volume hospitals, but there was no significant effect of the hospital/surgeon volume on short-term outcomes.

conclusionIn routine clinical practice, laparoscopic colectomy is associated with lower 30-day mortality, shorter length of stay, and greater likelihood of adjuvant chemotherapy initiation among stage III colon cancer patients when compared with open colectomy.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChemotherapy, AdjuvantColectomyColonic NeoplasmsComparative Effectiveness ResearchDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPatient Readmission

Identifiers

PMID25663688
PMCPMC4565531
OpenAlexW2165574568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.