Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25663601›Full record

SynthesisEndocrine2015

The incremental benefit of functional imaging in pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma: a systematic review.

Juan P Brito, Noor Asi, Michael R Gionfriddo, Catalina Norman, Aaron L Leppin, Claudia Zeballos-Palacios, Chaitanya Undavalli, Zhen Wang, Juan P Domecq, Gabriela Prustsky and 4 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Endocrine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Consensus on molecular imaging and theranostics in neuroendocrine neoplasms.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2021
    Review
  6. Precision Surgery for Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas.Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme · 2019
    Review
  7. Cancers · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Pheochromocytomas and Hypertension.Current hypertension reports · 2018
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Pheochromocytoma in Urologic Practice.European urology focus · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Juan P BritoDiabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Noor Asi
Michael R Gionfriddo
Catalina Norman
Aaron L Leppin
Claudia Zeballos-Palacios
Chaitanya Undavalli
Zhen Wang
Juan P Domecq
Gabriela Prustsky
Tarig A Elraiyah
Larry J Prokop
Victor M Montori
Mohammad Hassan Murad
Mayo Clinic · USWinnMed · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the major imaging modalities used for the localization of catecholamine-producing tumors (pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma). Functional imaging (FI) offers an alternative approach to localize, evaluate, and stage these tumors. Our objective was to describe the additive benefit of FI studies for patients with pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPG) who have undergone MRI or CT scan evaluation. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus from database inception through June 2012 for studies that included patients with biochemically proven PPGs who underwent CT or MRI and additional FI for the localization of PPGs. We included 32 studies enrolling a total of 1,264 patients with a mean age of 43-years old. The studies were uncontrolled and evaluated six FI modalities. FI tests provided small additive value to CT/MRI, aiding in the localization of only 24/1,445 primary cases (1.4 %) and 28/805 metastatic cases (3.5 %). In metastatic cases, 6-[F-18]fluoro-L-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) and fluorodopamine-PET (FDA) were the FI tests most successful at identifying disease missed by CT/MRI, providing additional benefit in 6/60 (10 %) and 5/78 (6.4 %) cases, respectively. No clinically significant findings were observed in any of the predefined subgroups. No study evaluated the impact of FI on the completeness of surgical resection or other patient-important outcomes. Observational evidence suggests that FI tests have a limited additional role in patients with PPGs who have undergone CT/MRI evaluation. However, the role of FI tests in specific subgroups of patients with atypical presentations (metastatic, extra-adrenal) as well as the use of hybrid FI tests should be explored. Further research should also evaluate the impact of FI tests on patient-important outcomes.

Indexed as

Adrenal Gland NeoplasmsAdultHumansMiddle AgedParagangliomaPheochromocytomaRadionuclide Imaging

Identifiers

PMID25663601
OpenAlexW1964655684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.