ArticlePhysiological reports2015
Responses to startling acoustic stimuli indicate that movement-related activation is constant prior to action: a replication with an alternate interpretation.
Article in Physiological reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electroacupuncture for Motor Recovery in Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Trial Exploring CReST-Related Modulation.Brain and behavior · 2026Trial
- Assessment of trunk flexion in arm reaching tasks with electromyography and smartphone accelerometry in healthy human subjects.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- What Is the StartReact Effect?Acta physiologica (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
- Effects of asymmetrical postural demands on sternocleidomastoid reflex in the startReact paradigm.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Startle-triggered responses indicate reticulospinal drive is larger for voluntary shoulder versus finger movements.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Response triggering by an acoustic stimulus increases with stimulus intensity and is best predicted by startle reflex activation.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Startle Increases the Incidence of Anticipatory Muscle Activations but Does Not Change the Task-Specific Muscle Onset for Patients After Subacute Stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- StartReact effects are dependent on engagement of startle reflex circuits: support for a subcortically mediated initiation pathway.Journal of neurophysiology · 2019Article
- StartReact during gait initiation reveals differential control of muscle activation and inhibition in patients with corticospinal degeneration.Journal of neurology · 2018Article
- Mechanical perturbations can elicit triggered reactions in the absence of a startle response.Experimental brain research · 2018Article
- StartReact effects in first dorsal interosseous muscle are absent in a pinch task, but present when combined with elbow flexion.PloS one · 2018Article
- Response preparation and execution during intentional bimanual pattern switching.Journal of neurophysiology · 2017Article
- Foreknowledge of an impending startling stimulus does not affect the proportion of startle reflexes or latency of StartReact responses.Experimental brain research · 2017Article
- Reduced motor preparation during dual-task performance: evidence from startle.Experimental brain research · 2015Article
- A broadband acoustic stimulus is more likely than a pure tone to elicit a startle reflex and prepared movements.Physiological reports · 2015Article
- Degraded expression of learned feedforward control in movements released by startle.Experimental brain research · 2015Article
- Reply to Maslovat et al.Journal of neurophysiology · 2015Article
- Responses to startling acoustic stimuli indicate that movement-related activation does not build up in anticipation of action.Journal of neurophysiology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A recent study by Marinovic et al. (J. Neurophysiol., 2013, 109: 996-1008) used a loud acoustic stimulus to probe motor preparation in a simple reaction time (RT) task. Based on decreasing RT latency and increases in motor output measures as the probe stimulus approached the "go" stimulus, the authors concluded that response-related activation increased abruptly 65 ms prior to the imperative stimulus, a result in contrast to previous literature. However, this study did not measure reflexive startle activity in the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscle, which has been used to delineate between response triggering by a loud acoustic stimuli and effects of stimulus intensity and/or intersensory facilitation. Due to this methodological limitation, it was unclear if the data accurately represented movement-related activation changes. In order to provide a measure as to whether response triggering occurred on each trial, the current experiment replicated the study by Marinovic et al., with the collection of muscle activation in the SCM. While the replication analyses involving all trials confirmed similar results to those reported by Marinovic et al., when data were limited to those in which startle-related SCM activation occurred, the results indicated that movement-related activation is constant in the 65 ms prior to action initiation. The difference between analyses suggests that when SCM activation is not considered, results may be confounded by trials in which the probe stimulus does not trigger the prepared response. Furthermore, these results provide additional confirmation that reflexive startle activation in the SCM is a robust indicator of response triggering by a loud acoustic stimulus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.