ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2015
Binding of VEGF-A is sufficient to abrogate the disturbing effects of VEGF-B together with VEGF-A on retinal endothelial cells.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeInhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a promising strategy to treat retinal complications of diabetes. In contrast to VEGF-A binding ranibizumab, aflibercept also binds to other members of the VEGF family including VEGF-B, but potential effects of this factor on permeability and angiogenic processes are unclear. Therefore, we studied how VEGF-B variants as single agents or together with VEGF-A165 might affect proliferation, migration, or barrier function of retinal endothelial cells (REC). Also investigated was the normalization of REC properties with both VEGF-inhibitors to explore if additional targeting of VEGF-B is relevant.
methodsStimulation of proliferation or migration of immortalized bovine REC (iBREC) and disturbance of their barrier by exposure to VEGF-B variants (as single factors or together with VEGF-A165) was determined with or without VEGF-binding proteins being added. Permeability of iBREC was assessed by measuring their transendothelial resistance (TER) and expression of the tight junction protein claudin-1.
resultsVEGF-B167 and VEGF-B186 enhanced proliferation of iBREC but these isoforms did not affect cell migration. Interestingly, ranibizumab completely blocked both migration and proliferation induced by VEGF-A plus VEGF-B. Both VEGF-B variants did also not affect barrier function or claudin-1 expression in a normal or high-glucose environment. Accordingly, binding VEGF-A was enough to normalize a reduced TER and reinstate claudin-1 lost during treatment with this factor in combination with VEGF-B.
conclusionsImportant properties and functions of REC seem not to be affected by any VEGF-B variant and targeting the key factor VEGF-A is sufficient to normalize growth factor-disturbed cells of this type.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.