Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25663342›Full record

ArticlePathogens and disease2015

Induction and inhibition of CPAF activity during analysis of Chlamydia-infected cells.

Kirsten A Johnson, Jennifer K Lee, Allan L Chen, Ming Tan, Christine Sütterlin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens and disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  4. The Small Molecule H89 InhibitsInfection and immunity · 2021
    Article
  5. Detection ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019
    Article
  6. Productive and Penicillin-StressedFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2017
    Article
  7. Development of a Proximity Labeling System to Map theFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Chlamydia cell biology and pathogenesis.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2016
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kirsten A JohnsonDepartment of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-2300, USA.
Jennifer K LeeDepartment of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-2300, USA.
Allan L ChenDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-4025, USA Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-4025, USA.
Ming TanDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-4025, USA School of Medicine, UC Irvine, Irvine CA 92697-3950, USA.
Christine SütterlinDepartment of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-2300, USA suetterc@uci.edu.
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

CARCINOGENESIST32CA009054 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI EDINGER, AIMEE L, FRUMAN, DAVID ALEXANDER · 1985 to 2025
$8.6M
Mechanism of Chlamydia-induced centrosome amplificationR21AI083851 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI SUETTERLIN, CHRISTINE, TAN, MING · 2009 to 2010
$404k
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009054NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI083851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of the chlamydial protease CPAF have been complicated by difficulties in distinguishing bona fide intracellular proteolysis from in vitro proteolysis. This confounding issue has been attributed to CPAF activity in lysates from Chlamydia-infected cells. We compared three methods that have been used to inhibit in vitro CPAF-mediated proteolysis: (1) pre-treatment of infected cells with the inhibitor clasto-lactacystin, (2) direct cell lysis in 8 M urea and (3) direct lysis in hot 1% SDS buffer. We identified a number of experimental conditions that reduce the effectiveness of each method in preventing CPAF activity during lysate preparation. The amount of in vitro proteolysis in a lysate was variable and depended on factors such as the specific substrate and the time in the intracellular infection. Additionally, we demonstrated for the first time that artifactual CPAF activity is induced before cell lysis by standard cell detachment methods, including trypsinization. Protein analysis of Chlamydia-infected cells therefore requires precautions to inhibit CPAF activity during both cell detachment and lysate preparation, followed by verification that the cell lysates do not contain residual CPAF activity. These concerns about artifactual proteolysis extend beyond studies of CPAF function because they have the potential to affect the analyses of host and chlamydial proteins from Chlamydia-infected cells.

Indexed as

Host-Pathogen InteractionsChlamydiaCytological TechniquesEndopeptidasesEpithelial CellsHeLa CellsHumansLactonesProtease InhibitorsProteomeSodium Dodecyl SulfateUreaclasto-lactacystin beta-lactoneCPA factorEndopeptidasesLactonesProtease InhibitorsProteomeSodium Dodecyl SulfateUreaproteolysisproteolytic activitysubstrates

Identifiers

PMID25663342
PMCPMC4492409
OpenAlexW2068568629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.