Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25663291›Full record

Observational studyRheumatology international2015

High variability in glucocorticoid starting doses in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: observational data from an early arthritis cohort.

Katinka Albrecht, Johanna Callhoff, Matthias Schneider, Angela Zink

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Rheumatology international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. [Glucocorticoids].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katinka AlbrechtGerman Rheumatism Research Centre, A Leibniz Institute, Epidemiology Unit, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany, albrecht@drfz.de.
Johanna Callhoff
Matthias Schneider
Angela Zink
Leibniz Association · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate initial glucocorticoid (GC) therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Six hundred sixty-nine patients with early RA were followed for 2 years in the multicenter "Course And Prognosis of Early Arthritis" cohort. Treatment was applied according to routine care. Assessments included disease activity (DAS28), disability Hannover Functional Status Questionnaire (FFbH), and treatment details. Mixed models, ANCOVA, and logistic regression models were used for statistical analysis. In total, 518 patients (77 %) received oral GCs at baseline; 20 % received a low dose (<7.5 mg prednisolone/day), 22 % received a moderate (7.5-19 mg), and 35 % received a high dose (≥20 mg). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, higher DAS28 values (OR 1.3) were associated with the use of higher GC doses at baseline (p < 0.001). After adjusting for age, sex, and baseline DAS28 and DMARDs, the patients who started with high-dose GCs had a greater improvement in DAS28 (month 3) and FFbH (month 6, p < 0.001 each). At 2 years, the mean DAS28 remission rates and FFbH values were similar. In all GC groups, the mean dose was tapered to 4 mg/day within 6 months. The reported comorbidities were not increased in patients with high-dose GC therapy. Starting treatment with high-dose GCs led to a better clinical response within 3 to 6 months compared to starting patients on lower dosages. Irrespective of the starting approach, rheumatologists tapered GCs down to a low dose within 6 months. With this strategy, clinical outcomes at 2 years did not differ relevantly.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidCohort StudiesDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMethotrexateMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOutpatient Clinics, HospitalPractice Patterns, Physicians'Antirheumatic AgentsGlucocorticoidsMethotrexatePrednisolone

Identifiers

PMID25663291
OpenAlexW1990174647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.