Trial reportNeurourology and urodynamics2016
Self-care management questionnaire for long-term indwelling urinary catheter users.
Trial report in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Testing a Model of Self-Management of Fluid Intake in Community-Residing Long-term Indwelling Urinary Catheter Users.Nursing researchTrial
- The financial burden of prolonged urinary retention in patients awaiting holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in the Quebec healthcare system A retrospective cohort study.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsSelf-management is believed to be an important behavioral capacity in people with chronic illness, and self-efficacy is an important component contributing to self-management. Two new and related measures for urinary catheter self-efficacy (C-SE) and self-management (C-SMG) were developed based on existing tools and tested for psychometrics for use in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) teaching urinary catheter self-management.
methodsThe instruments were evaluated at baseline (intake face to face interview) with 202 persons and with 158 of the same individuals 6 months later by telephone interviews. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted in an iterative process related to items' theoretical and statistical appropriateness. To assess construct validity and goodness of fit for model testing, confirmatory factor analysis was conducted with the samples at intake and 6 months. Also, bivariate analyses were conducted of the measures in relation to each other.
resultsBoth scales were modified reducing the items to 13 in each, with four factors in C-SE and three factors in C-SMG. Reliability testing (Cronbach's alpha) was viewed as satisfactory for both scales, though some of the subscale (factors) reliabilities were lower in the self-management measure. Confirmatory factor analysis was adequate. Correlation of the two instruments (r = 0.25, P < 001) suggests that they are related scales.
conclusionWith a change in the C-SMG scale from 3- to 5-level responses and subsequent testing, both new scales are appropriate for use separately or together as a questionnaire related to catheter self-care management in intervention research with long-term indwelling urinary catheter users. Neurourol. Urodynam. 35:492-496, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.