Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25663135›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2015

The impact of stratifying by family history in colorectal cancer screening programs.

Simon Lucas Goede, Linda Rabeneck, Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Ann G Zauber, Lawrence F Paszat, Jeffrey S Hoch, Jean H E Yong, Frank van Hees, Jill Tinmouth, Marjolein van Ballegooijen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Cost-effectiveness of Active Identification and Subsequent Colonoscopy Surveillance of Lynch Syndrome Cases.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2020
    Article
  4. Evidenced-Based Screening Strategies for a Positive Family History.Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Simon Lucas GoedeDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Linda RabeneckPrevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada.
Iris Lansdorp-VogelaarDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ann G ZauberDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Lawrence F PaszatInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada.
Jeffrey S HochInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada.
Jean H E YongCentre for Excellence in Economic Analysis Research, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St., Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Frank van HeesDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jill TinmouthInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada.
Marjolein van BallegooijenDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CACancer Care Ontario · CAHealth Sciences Centre · CAMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USSt. Michael's Hospital · CA

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Modeling Effective Health Policies for Colorectal CancerU01CA152959 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI KUNTZ, KAREN M, LANSDORP-VOGELAAR, IRIS · 2010 to 2014
$5.4M
Modeling Effective Health Policies for Colorectal CancerU01CA097426 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI ZAUBER, ANN GRAHAM · 2002 to 2010
$2.2M
Coordinating Center for Colorectal MicrosimulationU01CA115953 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI ZAUBER, ANN GRAHAM · 2005 to 2009
$1.1M
Canadian Institutes of Health Research CST-85478NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS U01 CA097426NCI NIH HHS U01-CA-097426NCI NIH HHS U01 CA115953NCI NIH HHS U01-CA-115953NCI NIH HHS U01 CA152959NCI NIH HHS U01-CA-152959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the province-wide colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program in Ontario, Canada, individuals with a family history of CRC are offered colonoscopy screening and those without are offered guaiac fecal occult blood testing (gFOBT, Hemoccult II). We used microsimulation modeling to estimate the cumulative number of CRC deaths prevented and colonoscopies performed between 2008 and 2038 with this family history-based screening program, compared to a regular gFOBT program. In both programs, we assumed screening uptake increased from 30% (participation level in 2008 before the program was launched) to 60%. We assumed that 11% of the population had a family history, defined as having at least one first-degree relative diagnosed with CRC. The programs offered screening between age 50 and 74 years, every two years for gFOBT, and every ten years for colonoscopy. Compared to opportunistic screening (2008 participation level kept constant at 30%), the gFOBT program cumulatively prevented 6,700 more CRC deaths and required 570,000 additional colonoscopies by 2038. The family history-based screening program increased these numbers to 9,300 and 1,100,000, a 40% and 93% increase, respectively. If biennial gFOBT was replaced with biennial fecal immunochemical test (FIT), annual Hemoccult Sensa or five-yearly sigmoidoscopy screening, both the added benefits and colonoscopies required would decrease. A biennial gFOBT screening program that identifies individuals with a family history of CRC and recommends them to undergo colonoscopy screening would prevent 40% (range in sensitivity analyses: 20-51%) additional deaths while requiring 93% (range: 43-116%) additional colonoscopies, compared to a regular gFOBT screening program.

Indexed as

Occult BloodAgedCanadaColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPedigreecolorectal cancercomputer simulationprevention and controlscreening

Identifiers

PMID25663135
PMCPMC4527954
OpenAlexW1894863407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.