Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25663124›Full record

ArticleThe patient2015

Information and Decision-Making Needs Among People with Anxiety Disorders: Results of an Online Survey.

Sarah Liebherz, Martin Härter, Jörg Dirmaier, Lisa Tlach

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The patient, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. How do users with comorbidity perceive participation in social services? A qualitative interview study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2021
    Article
  10. Shared Decision-Making and Information Needs among People with Generalized Anxiety Disorder.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah LiebherzDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, W26, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. s.liebherz@uke.de.
Martin HärterDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, W26, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Jörg DirmaierDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, W26, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Lisa TlachDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, W26, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with anxiety disorders are faced with treatment decisions considerably affecting their life. Patient decision aids are aimed at enabling patients to deliberate treatment options based on individual values and to participate in medical decisions.

objectiveThis is the first study to determine patients' information and decision-making needs as a pre-requisite for the development of patient decision aids for anxiety disorders.

methodsAn online cross-sectional survey was conducted between January and April 2013 on the e-health portal http://www.psychenet.de by using a self-administered questionnaire with items on internet use, online health information needs, role in decision making and important treatment decisions. Descriptive and inferential statistical as well as qualitative data analyses were performed.

resultsA total of 60 people with anxiety disorders with a mean age of 33.3 years (SD 10.5) participated in the survey. The most prevalent reasons for online health information search were the need for general information on anxiety disorders, the search for a physician or psychiatrist and the insufficiency of information given by the healthcare provider. Respondents experienced less shared and more autonomous decisions than they preferred. They assessed decisions on psychotherapy, medication, and treatment setting (inpatient or outpatient) as the most difficult decisions.

conclusionOur results confirm the importance of offering patient decision aids for people with anxiety disorders that encourage patients to participate in decision making by providing information about the pros and cons of evidence-based treatment options.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdolescentAdultAnxiety DisordersConsumer Health InformationCross-Sectional StudiesDecision Support TechniquesEducational StatusFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationPatient PreferenceYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.