Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25662861›Full record

Trial reportJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2015

Comparison of the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel hydrogenosulfate and clopidogrel besylate in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Michalis Hamilos, Ilias Saloustros, Emmanuel Skalidis, Nikolaos Igoumenidis, Marios Kambouris, Grigorios Chlouverakis, Despina Vougia, Ioannis Loggakis, Panos E Vardas, George Kochiadakis

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michalis HamilosCardiology Department, University Hospital of Heraklion, P.O. Box 1352, 71110, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Ilias Saloustros
Emmanuel Skalidis
Nikolaos Igoumenidis
Marios Kambouris
Grigorios Chlouverakis
Despina Vougia
Ioannis Loggakis
Panos E Vardas
George Kochiadakis
University Hospital of Heraklion · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well known that patients with poor response to antiplatelet therapy are most likely to have more thrombotic events. Clopidogrel hydrogensulfate (CHS) is a thienopyridine acting as an important antiplatelet agent alone or in combination with acetylsalicylic acid to prevent cardiovascular complications. A different clopidogrel salt, clopidogrel besylate (CB), was recently approved as a generic drug for the same purpose while data about its antiplatelet effect are very scarce. Our study compared the antiplatelet effect of CHS and CB in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Patients with stable coronary artery disease (n = 101) (coronary lesions defined angiographically 30-70 %) were randomized to either CHS (n = 50) or CB (n = 51). After randomization a 600 mg loading dose of the drug was given and monitoring of antiplatelet effect was done 12-14 h later with VerifyNow assay. Antiplatelet response was measured with P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) and % inhibition P2Y12 from baseline (% inhibition P2Y12). Moreover CYP2C19*2, CYP2C19*3 and CYP3Α5 polymorphisms were studied in all patients. Clinical characteristics were similar between the two study groups. No significant difference was observed for baseline platelet reactivity between CHS and CB patients (258 ± 38 vs. 256 ± 38 respectively, p = 0.79). No difference was found for antiplatelet response between the CHS and the CB group, assessed by PRU (195 ± 74 vs. 204 ± 67 respectively, p = 0.51) and by % inhibition P2Y12 (24 ± 25 vs. 24 ± 22 % respectively, p = 0.95). Number of heterozygotes for CYP2C19*2 polymorphism was comparable and their platelet reactivity was similar between the two study groups. Our results indicate that both CB and CHS had an identical antiplatelet effect in patients with stable coronary artery disease. No difference on platelet reactivity of heterozygotes for CYP2C19*2 polymorphism was found between the two study groups.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseasePlatelet ActivationAgedAspirinBlood PlateletsClopidogrelCytochrome P-450 CYP2C19Drug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHeterozygoteHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPolymorphism, GeneticProspective StudiesAspirinClopidogrelCYP2C19 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP2C19Platelet Aggregation InhibitorsTiclopidine

Identifiers

PMID25662861
OpenAlexW2073821249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.