ArticleMaternal and child health journal2015
A Statewide Medicaid Enhanced Prenatal and Postnatal Care Program and Infant Injuries.
Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Estimating the effect of Prenatal Care Coordination in Wisconsin: A sibling fixed effects analysis.Health services research · 2020Article
- Variable Uptake of Medicaid-Covered Prenatal Care Coordination: The Relevance of Treatment Level and Service Context.Journal of community health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To compare infant injuries in the first year of life between Maternal Infant Health Program (MIHP) participants and matched comparison groups. The population was the cohort of Medicaid-insured singleton infants born in 2011 in Michigan who had continuous Medicaid insurance and survived the first year after birth (N = 51,078). Propensity score matching was used to compare participants in MIHP to matched comparison groups from among the nonparticipants. Injury episodes were defined based on Medicaid claims in the first year of life. Matched comparisons were performed using McNemar, Bowker, and Wilcoxon signed rank tests to assess the effects of program participation on infant injuries. Infants of MIHP participants were more likely to have injury episodes (11.7 vs. 10.4 %, p < 0.01) and a higher rate of episodes (126.9/1,000 infants vs. 109.6/1,000) compared to matched nonparticipants. Infants of MIHP participants were more likely to have superficial injuries (4.9 vs. 3.9 %, p < 0.01) and a higher rate of episodes related to superficial injuries (49.7/1,000 vs. 39.6/1,000), which mainly accounted for the difference in injury visits between groups. Similar results were found among those enrolled and risk-screened in the program by the 2nd pregnancy trimester and who received a dosage of at least three additional MIHP contacts when compared to matched nonparticipants. MIHP participants did not experience reductions in infant injuries in the first year of life compared to matched nonparticipants. Possible explanations may include increased health-seeking behavior of the mothers participating in MIHP or improved recognition of infant injuries that warrant medical attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.