Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25662610›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2015

On the positive and negative affective responses to cocaine and their relation to drug self-administration in rats.

Aaron Ettenberg, Vira Fomenko, Konstantin Kaganovsky, Kerisa Shelton, Jennifer M Wenzel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Synaptic Adaptations at the Rostromedial Tegmental Nucleus Underlie Individual Differences in Cocaine Avoidance Behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Modeling the development of drug addiction in male and female animals.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aaron EttenbergBehavioral Pharmacology Laboratory, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106-9660, USA. aaron.ettenberg@psych.ucsb.edu.
Vira FomenkoBehavioral Pharmacology Laboratory, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106-9660, USA.
Konstantin KaganovskyBehavioral Pharmacology Laboratory, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106-9660, USA.
Kerisa SheltonBehavioral Pharmacology Laboratory, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106-9660, USA.
Jennifer M WenzelBehavioral Pharmacology Laboratory, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106-9660, USA.
University of California System · USBehavioral Pharma (United States) · US

Funding

MECHANISMS OF OPIATE AND STIMULANT DRUG REINFORCEMENTR01DA005041 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ETTENBERG, AARON · 1988 to 2010
$2.2M
Opponent process properties of cocaineR01DA033370 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI ETTENBERG, AARON · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
Mechanism of Opiate and Stimulant Drug ReinforcementR56DA005041 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI ETTENBERG, AARON · 2008 to 2008
$303k
NIDA NIH HHS DA05041NIDA NIH HHS DA33370NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA005041NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033370NIDA NIH HHS R56 DA005041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleAcute cocaine administration produces an initial rewarding state followed by a dysphoric/anxiogenic "crash."

objectiveThe objective of this study was to determine whether individual differences in the relative value of cocaine's positive and negative effects would account for variations in subsequent drug self-administration.

methodsThe dual actions of cocaine were assessed using a conditioned place test (where animals formed preferences for environments paired with the immediate rewarding effects of 1.0mg/kg i.v. cocaine or aversions of environments associated with the anxiogenic effects present 15-min postinjection) and a runway test (where animals developed approach-avoidance "retreat" behaviors about entering a goal box associated with cocaine delivery). Ranked scores from these two tests were then correlated with each other and with the escalation in the operant responding of the same subjects observed over 10 days of 1- or 6-h/day access to i.v. (0.4 mg/inj) cocaine self-administration.

resultsLarger place preferences were associated with faster runway start latencies (r s = -0.64), but not with retreat frequency or run times; larger place aversions predicted slower runway start times (r s = 0.62), increased run times (r s = 0.65), and increased retreats (r s = 0.62); response escalation was observed in both the 1- and 6-h self-administration groups and was associated with increased CPPs (r s = 0.58) but not CPAs, as well as with faster run times (r s = -0.60).

conclusionsTogether, these data suggest that animals exhibiting a greater positive than negative response to acute (single daily injections of) cocaine are at the greatest risk for subsequent escalated cocaine self-administration, a presumed indicator of cocaine addiction.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AddictiveCocaineCocaine-Related DisordersConditioning, OperantMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReaction TimeRewardSelf AdministrationCocaineCocaineCocaine addictionConditioned place testDrug abuseDrug aversionDrug rewardDrug self-administrationExtended accessOperant runwayOpponent processes

Identifiers

PMID25662610
PMCPMC4465857
OpenAlexW1995820542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.