Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25662467›Full record

ArticleMethods in enzymology2015

Sample preparation for phosphoproteomic analysis of circadian time series in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Johanna Krahmer, Matthew M Hindle, Sarah F Martin, Thierry Le Bihan, Andrew J Millar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in enzymology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Johanna KrahmerSynthSys and School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Matthew M HindleSynthSys and School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Sarah F MartinSynthSys and School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Thierry Le BihanSynthSys and School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Andrew J MillarSynthSys and School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. Electronic address: andrew.millar@ed.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D019621Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D019621/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J009423Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J009423/1Wellcome Trust 096995Wellcome Trust 096995/Z/11/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systems biological approaches to study the Arabidopsis thaliana circadian clock have mainly focused on transcriptomics while little is known about the proteome, and even less about posttranslational modifications. Evidence has emerged that posttranslational protein modifications, in particular phosphorylation, play an important role for the clock and its output. Phosphoproteomics is the method of choice for a large-scale approach to gain more knowledge about rhythmic protein phosphorylation. Recent plant phosphoproteomics publications have identified several thousand phosphopeptides. However, the methods used in these studies are very labor-intensive and therefore not suitable to apply to a well-replicated circadian time series. To address this issue, we present and compare different strategies for sample preparation for phosphoproteomics that are compatible with large numbers of samples. Methods are compared regarding number of identifications, variability of quantitation, and functional categorization. We focus on the type of detergent used for protein extraction as well as methods for its removal. We also test a simple two-fraction separation of the protein extract.

Indexed as

Circadian ClocksArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsGene OntologyPhosphoproteinsPhosphorylationProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProteomeProteomicsTandem Mass SpectrometryArabidopsis ProteinsPhosphoproteinsProteomeArabidopsisCircadian clockMass spectrometryPhosphoproteomicsProtein extractionProteomics

Identifiers

PMID25662467
PMCPMC4427183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.