Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25662228›Full record

ArticleJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2015

Applicability and safety of dual-frequency ultrasonic treatment for the transdermal delivery of drugs.

Carl M Schoellhammer, Sharanya Srinivasan, Ross Barman, Stacy H Mo, Baris E Polat, Robert Langer, Daniel Blankschtein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Harnessing Ultrasonic Technologies to TreatMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Low-Frequency Sonophoresis: A Promising Strategy for Enhanced Transdermal Delivery.Advances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Wearable patches for transdermal drug delivery.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. High-frequency, low-intensity ultrasound and microbubbles enhance nerve blockade.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Recent advances in ultrasound-based transdermal drug delivery.International journal of nanomedicine · 2018
    Review
  18. Getting Drugs Across Biological Barriers.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carl M SchoellhammerDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; The David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Sharanya SrinivasanDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Ross BarmanThe David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Stacy H MoDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; The David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Baris E PolatDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Robert LangerDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; The David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. Electronic address: rlanger@mit.edu.
Daniel BlankschteinDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. Electronic address: dblank@mit.edu.

Funding

VIRUS PRODUCTION COREP30CA014051 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MATTHEW G. VANDER HEIDEN · 1985 to 2026
$93.9M
Ultrasound Polymeric Drug DeliveryR01EB000351 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LANGER, ROBERT SAMUEL · 2002 to 2013
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS CA014051NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014051NIBIB NIH HHS EB-00351NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-frequency ultrasound presents an attractive method for transdermal drug delivery. The controlled, yet non-specific nature of enhancement broadens the range of therapeutics that can be delivered, while minimizing necessary reformulation efforts for differing compounds. Long and inconsistent treatment times, however, have partially limited the attractiveness of this method. Building on recent advances made in this area, the simultaneous use of low- and high-frequency ultrasound is explored in a physiologically relevant experimental setup to enable the translation of this treatment to testing in vivo. Dual-frequency ultrasound, utilizing 20kHz and 1MHz wavelengths simultaneously, was found to significantly enhance the size of localized transport regions (LTRs) in both in vitro and in vivo models while decreasing the necessary treatment time compared to 20kHz alone. Additionally, LTRs generated by treatment with 20kHz+1MHz were found to be more permeable than those generated with 20kHz alone. This was further corroborated with pore-size estimates utilizing hindered-transport theory, in which the pores in skin treated with 20kHz+1MHz were calculated to be significantly larger than the pores in skin treated with 20kHz alone. This demonstrates for the first time that LTRs generated with 20kHz+1MHz are also more permeable than those generated with 20kHz alone, which could broaden the range of therapeutics and doses administered transdermally. With regard to safety, treatment with 20kHz+1MHz both in vitro and in vivo appeared to result in no greater skin disruption than that observed in skin treated with 20kHz alone, an FDA-approved modality. This study demonstrates that dual-frequency ultrasound is more efficient and effective than single-frequency ultrasound and is well-tolerated in vivo.

Indexed as

UltrasonicsAdministration, CutaneousAnimalsFemaleIn Vitro TechniquesPharmaceutical PreparationsSkinSkin AbsorptionSwinePharmaceutical PreparationsCavitationDual-frequencySkinSonophoresisTransdermal drug deliveryUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID25662228
PMCPMC4825056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.