Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25662010›Full record

ArticleCell2015

Manipulating the selection forces during affinity maturation to generate cross-reactive HIV antibodies.

Shenshen Wang, Jordi Mata-Fink, Barry Kriegsman, Melissa Hanson, Darrell J Irvine, Herman N Eisen, Dennis R Burton, K Dane Wittrup, Mehran Kardar, Arup K Chakraborty

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 210 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Modeling the Synergetic Dynamics of B cells and TbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Epistatic hotspots organize antibody fitness landscape and boost evolvability.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shenshen WangRagon Institute of MGH, MIT, and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02139; Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139; Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Jordi Mata-FinkRagon Institute of MGH, MIT, and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02139; Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Barry KriegsmanDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Melissa HansonDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Darrell J IrvineRagon Institute of MGH, MIT, and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02139; Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139; Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Herman N EisenKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139; Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Dennis R BurtonRagon Institute of MGH, MIT, and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02139; Department of Immunology and Microbial Science, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037.
K Dane WittrupDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139; Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Mehran KardarDepartment of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Arup K ChakrabortyRagon Institute of MGH, MIT, and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02139; Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139; Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139; Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139; Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139; Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139. Electronic address: arupc@mit.edu.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · USRagon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard · US

Funding

Support Component D/Vaccine Discovery, Concept to ClinicUM1AI100663 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI GODZIK, ADAM · 2012 to 2018
$131.5M
HUMAN ANTIBODIES TO HIV-1 BY REPERTOIRE CLONINGR01AI033292 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI BURTON, DENNIS R. · 1992 to 2013
$5.9M
Localizing Immunotherapy to Improve Therapeutic IndexR01CA174795 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI WITTRUP, KARL DANE · 2013 to 2017
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA174795NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI033292NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI100663NIAID NIH HHS UM1AI100663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generation of potent antibodies by a mutation-selection process called affinity maturation is a key component of effective immune responses. Antibodies that protect against highly mutable pathogens must neutralize diverse strains. Developing effective immunization strategies to drive their evolution requires understanding how affinity maturation happens in an environment where variants of the same antigen are present. We present an in silico model of affinity maturation driven by antigen variants which reveals that induction of cross-reactive antibodies often occurs with low probability because conflicting selection forces, imposed by different antigen variants, can frustrate affinity maturation. We describe how variables such as temporal pattern of antigen administration influence the outcome of this frustrated evolutionary process. Our calculations predict, and experiments in mice with variant gp120 constructs of the HIV envelope protein confirm, that sequential immunization with antigen variants is preferred over a cocktail for induction of cross-reactive antibodies focused on the shared CD4 binding site epitope.

Indexed as

Cross ReactionsAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntigenic VariationB-LymphocytesComputer SimulationHIV-1HIV Envelope Protein gp120MiceAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, Viralgp120 protein, Human immunodeficiency virus 1HIV Envelope Protein gp120

Identifiers

PMID25662010
PMCPMC4357364
OpenAlexW2054069391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.