ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2015
Using natural language processing to extract mammographic findings.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A scoping review of natural language processing of radiology reports in breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- External validation of a machine learning classifier to identify unhealthy alcohol use in hospitalized patients.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2022Article
- Generate Structured Radiology Report from CT Images Using Image Annotation Techniques: Preliminary Results with Liver CT.Journal of digital imaging · 2020Article
- The implementation of natural language processing to extract index lesions from breast magnetic resonance imaging reports.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019Article
- Automatic extraction of imaging observation and assessment categories from breast magnetic resonance imaging reports with natural language processing.Chinese medical journal · 2019Article
- Automated annotation and classification of BI-RADS assessment from radiology reports.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2017Article
- Contralateral Breast Cancer Event Detection Using Nature Language Processing.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2017Article
- Measuring Preventive Care Delivery: Comparing Rates Across Three Data Sources.American journal of preventive medicine · 2016Article
- Using automatically extracted information from mammography reports for decision-support.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2016Article
- Natural Language Processing Based Instrument for Classification of Free Text Medical Records.BioMed research internationalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveStructured data on mammographic findings are difficult to obtain without manual review. We developed and evaluated a rule-based natural language processing (NLP) system to extract mammographic findings from free-text mammography reports. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe NLP system extracted four mammographic findings: mass, calcification, asymmetry, and architectural distortion, using a dictionary look-up method on 93,705 mammography reports from Group Health. Status annotations and anatomical location annotation were associated to each NLP detected finding through association rules. After excluding negated, uncertain, and historical findings, affirmative mentions of detected findings were summarized. Confidence flags were developed to denote reports with highly confident NLP results and reports with possible NLP errors. A random sample of 100 reports was manually abstracted to evaluate the accuracy of the system.
resultsThe NLP system correctly coded 96-99 out of our sample of 100 reports depending on findings. Measures of sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive values exceeded 0.92 for all findings. Positive predictive values were relatively low for some findings due to their low prevalence. DISCUSSION: Our NLP system was implemented entirely in SAS Base, which makes it portable and easy to implement. It performed reasonably well with multiple applications, such as using confidence flags as a filter to improve the efficiency of manual review. Refinements of library and association rules, and testing on more diverse samples may further improve its performance.
conclusionOur NLP system successfully extracts clinically useful information from mammography reports. Moreover, SAS is a feasible platform for implementing NLP algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.