Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25661260›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2015

Using natural language processing to extract mammographic findings.

Hongyuan Gao, Erin J Aiello Bowles, David Carrell, Diana S M Buist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Contralateral Breast Cancer Event Detection Using Nature Language Processing.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hongyuan GaoGroup Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: Gao.h@ghc.org.
Erin J Aiello BowlesGroup Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
David CarrellGroup Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Diana S M BuistGroup Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Risk-based Imaging Strategies to Improve Breast Cancer Surveillance OutcomesP01CA154292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KARLA M KERLIKOWSKE · 2011 to 2026
$52.9M
Natural Language Processing for Cancer Research Network Surveillance StudiesRC1CA146917 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI CARRELL, DAVID S. · 2009 to 2010
$992k
NCI NIH HHS CA146917NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201100031CNCI NIH HHS P01 CA154292NCI NIH HHS P01CA154292NCI NIH HHS RC1 CA146917
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveStructured data on mammographic findings are difficult to obtain without manual review. We developed and evaluated a rule-based natural language processing (NLP) system to extract mammographic findings from free-text mammography reports. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe NLP system extracted four mammographic findings: mass, calcification, asymmetry, and architectural distortion, using a dictionary look-up method on 93,705 mammography reports from Group Health. Status annotations and anatomical location annotation were associated to each NLP detected finding through association rules. After excluding negated, uncertain, and historical findings, affirmative mentions of detected findings were summarized. Confidence flags were developed to denote reports with highly confident NLP results and reports with possible NLP errors. A random sample of 100 reports was manually abstracted to evaluate the accuracy of the system.

resultsThe NLP system correctly coded 96-99 out of our sample of 100 reports depending on findings. Measures of sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive values exceeded 0.92 for all findings. Positive predictive values were relatively low for some findings due to their low prevalence. DISCUSSION: Our NLP system was implemented entirely in SAS Base, which makes it portable and easy to implement. It performed reasonably well with multiple applications, such as using confidence flags as a filter to improve the efficiency of manual review. Refinements of library and association rules, and testing on more diverse samples may further improve its performance.

conclusionOur NLP system successfully extracts clinically useful information from mammography reports. Moreover, SAS is a feasible platform for implementing NLP algorithms.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMammographySensitivity and SpecificitySoftwareEvaluationMammographic findingsNatural language processingSAS-based

Identifiers

PMID25661260
PMCPMC4408241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.