Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25660347›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in immunology2015

Discovering protective CD8 T cell epitopes--no single immunologic property predicts it!

Pavlo Gilchuk, Timothy M Hill, John T Wilson, Sebastian Joyce

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. CD8F1000Research · 2018
    Review
  7. PD-1 Blockade Promotes Epitope Spreading in Anticancer CD8Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2017
    Article
  8. The Journal of biological chemistry · 2017
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pavlo GilchukVeterans Administration Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37332, USA; Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37332, USA.
Timothy M HillDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37332, USA.
John T WilsonDepartment of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, School of Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37332, USA.
Sebastian JoyceVeterans Administration Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37332, USA; Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37332, USA. Electronic address: sebastian.joyce@vanderbilt.edu.
Vanderbilt University · USVA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System · US

Funding

YOHIMBINE AS A MODEL OF ORTHOSTATIC INTOLERANCEM01RR000095 · NCRR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DRAKE, WONDER P. · 1985 to 2008
$38.3M
MOLECULAR BASIS OF CDLDL AND NATURAL T CELL FUNCTIONR01AI042284 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI JOYCE, SEBASTIAN · 1998 to 2013
$3.1M
MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY OF MINOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGENR01HL054977 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI JOYCE, SEBASTIAN · 1995 to 2009
$2.6M
Molecular Basis of iNKT Cell Ontogeny and FunctionR01AI061721 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI JOYCE, SEBASTIAN · 2006 to 2010
$2.1M
Processing and Presentation of Minor Histocompatibility Antigens that Cause GvHDR01HL121139 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI JOYCE, SEBASTIAN · 2014 to 2017
$1.6M
Molecular Basis of CD1d1 and Natural T Cell FunctionR21AI042284 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI JOYCE, SEBASTIAN · 2002 to 2002
$302k
Vaccinating at Mucosal Surfaces with Nanoparticle Conjugated Antigen and AdjuvantI01BX001444 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI JOYCE, SEBASTIAN · 2014 to 2022
–
BLRD VA I01 BX001444NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000095NHLBI NIH HHS HL054977NHLBI NIH HHS HL121139NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL054977NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL121139NIAID NIH HHS AI042284NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI040079NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI042284NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI061721NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI042284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Once a burgeoning field of study, over the past decade or so, T cell epitope discovery has lost some luster. The contributory factors perchance are the general notion that any newly discovered epitope will reveal very little about an immune response and that knowledge of epitopes are less critical for vaccine design. Despite these notions, the breadth and depth of T cell epitopes derived from clinically important microbial agents of human diseases largely remain ill defined. We review here a flurry of recent reports that have rebirthed the field. These reports reveal that epitope discovery is an essential step toward rational vaccine design and critical for monitoring vaccination efficacy. The new findings also indicate that neither immunogenicity nor immunodominance predict protective immunity. Hence, an immunogenic epitope is but a peptide unless proven protective against disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigen PresentationCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesDatabases, FactualEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHumansReceptors, Antigen, T-CellVaccinesEpitopes, T-LymphocyteReceptors, Antigen, T-CellVaccines

Identifiers

PMID25660347
PMCPMC5023008
OpenAlexW2046582100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.