Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25660122›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2015

School nutrition guidelines: overview of the implementation and evaluation.

Matej Gregorič, Larisa Pograjc, Alenka Pavlovec, Marjan Simčič, Mojca Gabrijelčič Blenkuš

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Programmes, policies and implementation.Public health nutrition · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matej Gregorič1National Institute of Public Health,Health Survey and Health Promotion Centre,Trubarjeva 2,1000 Ljubljana,Slovenia.
Larisa Pograjc2Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Slovenia,Department for Military Technology,Research and Development,Ljubljana,Slovenia.
Alenka Pavlovec3Ministry of Education,Science and Sport of the Republic of Slovenia,The Pre-School and Basic Education Directorate,Ljubljana,Slovenia.
Marjan Simčič4University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty,Department of Food Science and Technology,Ljubljana,Slovenia.
Mojca Gabrijelčič Blenkuš1National Institute of Public Health,Health Survey and Health Promotion Centre,Trubarjeva 2,1000 Ljubljana,Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo holistically evaluate the extent of implementation of dietary guidelines in schools and present various monitoring systems.

designThe study comprises three methods: (i) a cross-sectional survey (process evaluation); (ii) an indicator-based evaluation (menu quality); and (iii) a 5 d weighed food record of school lunches (output evaluation).

settingSlovenian primary schools. SUBJECTS: A total 234 food-service managers from 488 schools completed a self-administrated questionnaire for process evaluation; 177 out of 194 randomly selected schools provided menus for menu quality evaluation; and 120 school lunches from twenty-four schools were measured and nutritionally analysed for output evaluation.

resultsThe survey among food-service managers revealed high levels of implementation at almost all process evaluation areas of the guidelines. An even more successful implementation of these guidelines was found in relation to organization cultural issues as compared with technical issues. Differences found in some process evaluation areas were related to location, size and socio-economic characteristics of schools. Evaluation of school menu quality demonstrated that score values followed a normal distribution. Higher (better) nutrition scores were found in larger-sized schools and corresponding municipalities with higher socio-economic status. School lunches did not meet minimum recommendations for energy, carbohydrates or dietary fibre intake, nor for six vitamins and three (macro, micro and trace) elements.

conclusionsThe implementation of the guidelines was achieved differently at distinct levels. The presented multilevel evaluation suggests that different success in implementation might be attributed to different characteristics of individual schools. System changes might also be needed to support and improve implementation of the guidelines.

Indexed as

Child Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaNutrition PolicyChildCross-Sectional StudiesFood ServicesHumansLunchMenu PlanningProgram EvaluationSchool Health ServicesSloveniaSurveys and QuestionnairesEvaluationMenu quality scoresNutritional valuePrimary school

Identifiers

PMID25660122
PMCPMC10271848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.