Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25659982›Full record

ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2015

[Cryoablation of prostate cancer].

U K F Witzsch, E Becht

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

U K F WitzschKlinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Krankenhaus Nordwest GmbH, Stiftung Hospital zum Heiligen Geist, Steinbacher Hohl 2-26, 60488, Frankfurt/Main, Deutschland, witzsch.ullrich@khnw.de.
E Becht

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to continuous technical developments for more than 60 years followed by better clinical results with minimal side effects, cryoablation of the prostate for localized prostate cancer has evolved as a true alternative therapeutic option for selected patients. THEMATA: The current form of cryoablation has almost nothing in common with those established in the 1960s and 1970s, which were further developed in the 1980s and 1990s. Nowadays it is a minimally invasively and highly effective treatment for high-risk carcinomas and failure of other therapeutic modalities.

conclusionThus, cryoablation of the prostate is indicated if there are absolute or relative contraindications for radical surgery. In salvage cases for localized prostate cancer, cryoablation is the therapy of choice. Cryoablation is also an option for focal therapy. Standardization of the procedure, definition of freeze-thaw cycles, and structured training programs have led to this status.

Indexed as

CryosurgeryEvidence-Based MedicineGermanyHumansMaleMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresProstatic NeoplasmsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.