Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25659649›Full record

ArticleGenome research2015

MIPSTR: a method for multiplex genotyping of germline and somatic STR variation across many individuals.

Keisha D Carlson, Peter H Sudmant, Maximilian O Press, Evan E Eichler, Jay Shendure, Christine Queitsch

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. PolyG-DS: An ultrasensitive polyguanine tract-profiling method to detect clonal expansions and trace cell lineage.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Keisha D CarlsonDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA;
Peter H SudmantDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA;
Maximilian O PressDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA;
Evan E EichlerDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Jay ShendureDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA;
Christine QueitschDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA;
University of Washington · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING IN GENOMIC SCIENCEST32HG000035 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Bruce Colston Trapnell · 1995 to 2026
$24.2M
Sequence and Assembly of Segmental DuplicationsR01HG002385 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Evan Eichler · 2001 to 2026
$13.3M
INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING IN DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGYT32HD007183 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAIBLE, DAVID W · 1985 to 2015
$5.7M
Does organismal robustness explain the missing heritability in complex diseases?DP2OD008371 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI QUEITSCH, CHRISTINE · 2011 to 2011
$2.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS 2T32HG35-16NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002385NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000035NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG00035NIH HHS DP2 OD008371NIH HHS DP2OD008371
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Short tandem repeats (STRs) are highly mutable genetic elements that often reside in regulatory and coding DNA. The cumulative evidence of genetic studies on individual STRs suggests that STR variation profoundly affects phenotype and contributes to trait heritability. Despite recent advances in sequencing technology, STR variation has remained largely inaccessible across many individuals compared to single nucleotide variation or copy number variation. STR genotyping with short-read sequence data is confounded by (1) the difficulty of uniquely mapping short, low-complexity reads; and (2) the high rate of STR amplification stutter. Here, we present MIPSTR, a robust, scalable, and affordable method that addresses these challenges. MIPSTR uses targeted capture of STR loci by single-molecule Molecular Inversion Probes (smMIPs) and a unique mapping strategy. Targeted capture and our mapping strategy resolve the first challenge; the use of single molecule information resolves the second challenge. Unlike previous methods, MIPSTR is capable of distinguishing technical error due to amplification stutter from somatic STR mutations. In proof-of-principle experiments, we use MIPSTR to determine germline STR genotypes for 102 STR loci with high accuracy across diverse populations of the plant A. thaliana. We show that putatively functional STRs may be identified by deviation from predicted STR variation and by association with quantitative phenotypes. Using DNA mixing experiments and a mutant deficient in DNA repair, we demonstrate that MIPSTR can detect low-frequency somatic STR variants. MIPSTR is applicable to any organism with a high-quality reference genome and is scalable to genotyping many thousands of STR loci in thousands of individuals.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDNA Copy Number VariationsMicrosatellite RepeatsArabidopsisGenome, PlantGenotyping TechniquesGerm-Line MutationMultiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction

Identifiers

PMID25659649
PMCPMC4417122
OpenAlexW2057236019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.