Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25659377›Full record

ArticleGenetics2015

Evolutionary and functional analysis of the invariant SWIM domain in the conserved Shu2/SWS1 protein family from Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Homo sapiens.

Stephen K Godin, Camille Meslin, Faiz Kabbinavar, Dominique S Bratton-Palmer, Christina Hornack, Michael J Mihalevic, Kyle Yoshida, Meghan Sullivan, Nathan L Clark, Kara A Bernstein

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. RAD51 paralog function in replicative DNA damage and tolerance.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Evolution-based screening enables genome-wide prioritization and discovery of DNA repair genes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen K GodinUniversity of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213.
Camille MeslinDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213.
Faiz KabbinavarUniversity of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213.
Dominique S Bratton-PalmerUniversity of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213.
Christina HornackUniversity of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213.
Michael J MihalevicUniversity of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213.
Kyle YoshidaUniversity of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213.
Meghan SullivanUniversity of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213.
Nathan L ClarkDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213 karab@pitt.edu nclark@pitt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0006-8374
Kara A BernsteinUniversity of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213 karab@pitt.edu nclark@pitt.edu.
UPMC Hillman Cancer Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Replication fork dynamics and repair by Rad51 paralogues after DNA alkylationR01ES024872 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BERNSTEIN, KARA A · 2015 to 2019
$2.4M
Mechanistic insights into the SHU complex and Sgs1 in DNA repair and replicationR00GM088413 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BERNSTEIN, KARA A · 2011 to 2013
$772k
Mechanistic insights into the SHU complex and Sgs1 in DNA repair and replicationK99GM088413 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BERNSTEIN, KARA A · 2009 to 2010
$180k
NIEHS NIH HHS ES-0244872NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES024872NIGMS NIH HHS GM-088413NIGMS NIH HHS K99 GM088413NIGMS NIH HHS R00 GM088413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Shu2 protein is an important regulator of Rad51, which promotes homologous recombination (HR). Shu2 functions in the Shu complex with Shu1 and the Rad51 paralogs Csm2 and Psy3. Shu2 belongs to the SWS1 protein family, which is characterized by its SWIM domain (CXC...Xn...CXH), a zinc-binding motif. In humans, SWS1 interacts with the Rad51 paralog SWSAP1. Using genetic and evolutionary analyses, we examined the role of the Shu complex in mitotic and meiotic processes across eukaryotic lineages. We provide evidence that the SWS1 protein family contains orthologous genes in early-branching eukaryote lineages (e.g., Giardia lamblia), as well as in multicellular eukaryotes including Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster. Using sequence analysis, we expanded the SWIM domain to include an invariant alanine three residues after the terminal CXH motif (CXC…Xn…CXHXXA). We found that the SWIM domain is conserved in all eukaryotic orthologs, and accordingly, in vivo disruption of the invariant residues within the canonical SWIM domain inhibits DNA damage tolerance in yeast and protein-protein interactions in yeast and humans. Furthermore, using evolutionary analyses, we found that yeast and Drosophila Shu2 exhibit strong coevolutionary signatures with meiotic proteins, and in yeast, its disruption leads to decreased meiotic progeny. Together our data indicate that the SWS1 family is an ancient and highly conserved eukaryotic regulator of meiotic and mitotic HR.

Indexed as

Conserved SequenceEvolution, MolecularAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsCell Cycle ProteinsHumansMolecular Sequence DataMultigene FamilyProtein Structure, TertiarySaccharomyces cerevisiaeSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsSchizosaccharomyces pombe Proteinsshu2 protein, S cerevisiaebudding yeastDNA repairevolutionary rate covariationhomologous recombinationShu complex

Identifiers

PMID25659377
PMCPMC4391554
OpenAlexW2020685225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.