Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25659322›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2015

Pathogen manipulation of B cells: the best defence is a good offence.

Katharina Nothelfer, Philippe J Sansonetti, Armelle Phalipon

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. CD19Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Exploiting Unique Features of Microneedles to Modulate Immunity.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2023
    Review
  18. Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. iScience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katharina Nothelfer1] Institut Pasteur, Unité de Pathogénie Microbienne Moléculaire, 75724 Paris, CEDEX 15, France. [2] INSERM U1202, Unité de Pathogénie Microbienne Moléculaire, 75724 Paris, CEDEX 15, France. [3] Department of Immunology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Philippe J Sansonetti1] Institut Pasteur, Unité de Pathogénie Microbienne Moléculaire, 75724 Paris, CEDEX 15, France. [2] INSERM U1202, Unité de Pathogénie Microbienne Moléculaire, 75724 Paris, CEDEX 15, France. [3] Collège de France, Chaire de Microbiologie et Maladies Infectieuses, 75005 Paris, France.
Armelle Phalipon1] Institut Pasteur, Unité de Pathogénie Microbienne Moléculaire, 75724 Paris, CEDEX 15, France. [2] INSERM U1202, Unité de Pathogénie Microbienne Moléculaire, 75724 Paris, CEDEX 15, France.

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

B cells have long been regarded as simple antibody production units, but are now becoming known as key players in both adaptive and innate immune responses. However, several bacteria, viruses and parasites have evolved the ability to manipulate B cell functions to modulate immune responses. Pathogens can affect B cells indirectly, by attacking innate immune cells and altering the cytokine environment, and can also target B cells directly, impairing B cell-mediated immune responses. In this Review, we provide a summary of recent advances in elucidating direct B cell-pathogen interactions and highlight how targeting this specific cell population benefits different pathogens.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaHost-Pathogen InteractionsImmune EvasionVirus Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsBacteriaB-LymphocytesHumansParasitesViruses

Identifiers

PMID25659322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.