ArticlePloS one2015
Antennal transcriptome analysis and comparison of chemosensory gene families in two closely related noctuidae moths, Helicoverpa armigera and H. assulta.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
76 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-wide identification of olfactory receptor and odorant-binding protein gene families and their roles in Heliothine chemosensory evolution.Insect molecular biology · 2026Article
- Antennal transcriptome analysis and expression profiling of odorant binding proteins and odorant receptors in the teak defoliator, Hyblaea puera (Lepidoptera: Hyblaeidae).BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of Chemosensory Gene Families in the MayflyGenes · 2026Article
- Transcriptomic divergences of larval labial salivary glands facilitate host-plant range oscillations between specialist and generalist Helicoverpa species.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Expanding the sensory horizon: chemosensory receptors beyond traditional olfactory and taste organs in insects.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Review
- Functional Characterization of a Female-Biased Chemoreceptor of the Codling Moth (Cydia pomonella) Responding to Aldehydes and Other Volatile Compounds.Journal of chemical ecology · 2025Article
- Article
- Functional Characterization of an Odorant Receptor Expressed in Newly Hatched Larvae of Fall ArmywormInsects · 2024Article
- Can genomic signatures guide the selection of host-specific agents for weed biological control?Evolutionary applications · 2024Article
- Comparative Transcriptomic Assessment of Chemosensory Genes in Adult and Larval Olfactory Organs ofGenes · 2023Article
- Evolutionary shifts in pheromone receptors contribute to speciation in four Helicoverpa species.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023Article
- A green leaf volatile, (Z)-3-hexenyl-acetate, mediates differential oviposition by Spodoptera frugiperda on maize and rice.BMC biology · 2023Article
- Genome-Wide Analysis of the Odorant Receptor Gene Family inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Antennal transcriptome analysis of odorant-binding proteins and characterization of GOBP2 in the variegated cutwormFrontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- SympatricFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023Article
- Mutagenesis of the odorant receptor co-receptor (Orco) reveals severe olfactory defects in the crop pest moth Helicoverpa armigera.BMC biology · 2022Article
- The Genetic Basis of Gene Expression Divergence in Antennae of Two Closely Related Moth Species,International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Odor Perception in the Cotton Bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera, Exposed to Juglans regia, a Marginal Host Plant.Journal of chemical ecology · 2022Article
- Article
- Insights Into Chemosensory Proteins From Non-Model Insects: Advances and Perspectives in the Context of Pest Management.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Review
16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To better understand the olfactory mechanisms in the two lepidopteran pest model species, the Helicoverpa armigera and H. assulta, we conducted transcriptome analysis of the adult antennae using Illumina sequencing technology and compared the chemosensory genes between these two related species. Combined with the chemosensory genes we had identified previously in H. armigera by 454 sequencing, we identified 133 putative chemosensory unigenes in H. armigera including 60 odorant receptors (ORs), 19 ionotropic receptors (IRs), 34 odorant binding proteins (OBPs), 18 chemosensory proteins (CSPs), and 2 sensory neuron membrane proteins (SNMPs). Consistent with these results, 131 putative chemosensory genes including 64 ORs, 19 IRs, 29 OBPs, 17 CSPs, and 2 SNMPs were identified through male and female antennal transcriptome analysis in H. assulta. Reverse Transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) was conducted in H. assulta to examine the accuracy of the assembly and annotation of the transcriptome and the expression profile of these unigenes in different tissues. Most of the ORs, IRs and OBPs were enriched in adult antennae, while almost all the CSPs were expressed in antennae as well as legs. We compared the differences of the chemosensory genes between these two species in detail. Our work will surely provide valuable information for further functional studies of pheromones and host volatile recognition genes in these two related species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.