Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25659081›Full record

ReviewTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2015

Feeder Layer Cell Actions and Applications.

Sara Llames, Eva García-Pérez, Álvaro Meana, Fernando Larcher, Marcela del Río

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 159 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara Llames1 Tissue Engineering Unit, Centro Comunitario de Sangre y Tejidos del Principado de Asturias, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER U714) , Oviedo, Spain .
Eva García-Pérez1 Tissue Engineering Unit, Centro Comunitario de Sangre y Tejidos del Principado de Asturias, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER U714) , Oviedo, Spain .
Álvaro Meana1 Tissue Engineering Unit, Centro Comunitario de Sangre y Tejidos del Principado de Asturias, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER U714) , Oviedo, Spain .
Fernando Larcher2 TERMEG, Department of Bioengineering, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (UC3M) , Madrid, Spain .
Marcela del Río2 TERMEG, Department of Bioengineering, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (UC3M) , Madrid, Spain .
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cultures of growth-arrested feeder cells have been used for years to promote cell proliferation, particularly with low-density inocula. Basically, feeder cells consist in a layer of cells unable to divide, which provides extracellular secretions to help another cell to proliferate. It differs from a coculture system because only one cell type is capable to proliferate. It is known that feeder cells support the growth of target cells by releasing growth factors to the culture media, but this is not the only way that feeder cells promote the growth of target cells. In this work, we discuss the different mechanisms of action of feeder cells, tackling questions as to why for some cell cultures the presence of feeder cell layers is mandatory, while in some other cases, the growth of target cells can be achieved with just a conditioned medium. Different treatments to avoid feeder cells to proliferate are revised, not only the classical treatments as mitomycin or γ-irradiation but also the not so common treatments as electric pulses or chemical fixation. Regenerative medicine has been gaining importance in recent years as a discipline that moves biomedical technology from the laboratory to the patients. In this context, human stem and pluripotent cells play an important role, but the presence of feeder cells is necessary for these progenitor cells to grow and differentiate. This review addresses recent specific applications, including those associated to the growth of embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells. In addition, we have also dealt with safety issues, including feeder cell sources, as major factors of concern for clinical applications.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesCell ProliferationCells, CulturedEpithelial CellsFeeder CellsHumansStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID25659081
PMCPMC4533020
OpenAlexW1722374088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.