Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25658872›Full record

ArticlePopulation health management2015

Propensity to Succeed: Prioritizing Individuals Most Likely to Benefit from Care Coordination.

Kevin Hawkins, Ronald J Ozminkowski, Asif Mujahid, Timothy S Wells, Gandhi R Bhattarai, Sara Wang, Cynthia E Hommer, Jinghua Huang, Richard J Migliori, Charlotte S Yeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Population health management, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kevin Hawkins1 Advanced Analytics, Optum Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ronald J Ozminkowski2 Healthcare Analytics, Optum Consumer Solutions Group , Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Asif Mujahid3 Consumer Analytics and Insights, Optum Golden Valley, Minnesota.
Timothy S Wells1 Advanced Analytics, Optum Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Gandhi R Bhattarai4 Advanced Analytics, OptumInsight , Rocky Hill, Connecticut.
Sara Wang5 Advanced Analytics, OptumInsight , Lexington, Massachusetts.
Cynthia E Hommer6 MCG-Part of the Hearst Health Network , Seattle, Washington.
Jinghua Huang1 Advanced Analytics, Optum Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Richard J Migliori7 Health Services, UnitedHealth Group , Minnetonka, Minnesota.
Charlotte S Yeh8 AARP Services, Inc., Washington, DC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective was to develop a propensity to succeed (PTS) process for prioritizing outreach to individuals with Medicare Supplement (ie, Medigap) plans who qualified for a high-risk case management (HRCM) program. Demographic, socioeconomic, health status, and local health care supply data from previous HRCM program participants and nonparticipants were obtained from Medigap membership and health care claims data and public data sources. Three logistic regression models were estimated to find members with higher probabilities of engaging in the HRCM program, receiving high quality of care once engaged, and incurring enough monetary savings related to program participation to more than offset program costs. The logistic regression model intercepts and coefficients yielded the information required to build predictive models that were then applied to generate predicted probabilities of program engagement, high quality of care, and cost savings a priori for different members who later qualified for the HRCM program. Predicted probabilities from the engagement and cost models were then standardized and combined to obtain an overall PTS score, which was sorted from highest to lowest and used to prioritize outreach efforts to those newly eligible for the HRCM program. The validity of the predictive models also was estimated. The PTS models for engagement and financial savings were statistically valid. The combined PTS score based on those 2 components helped prioritize outreach to individuals who qualified for the HRCM program. Using PTS models may help increase program engagement and financial success of care coordination programs.

Indexed as

Program EvaluationAgedAged, 80 and overCase ManagementCost SavingsFemaleHumansMaleMedicareUnited States

Identifiers

PMID25658872
PMCPMC4685508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.