Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25658706›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Characterization and propagation of tumor initiating cells derived from colorectal liver metastases: trials, tribulations and a cautionary note.

Mark I James, Lynne M Howells, Ankur Karmokar, Jennifer A Higgins, Peter Greaves, Hong Cai, Ashley Dennison, Matthew Metcalfe, Giuseppe Garcea, David M Lloyd and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mark I JamesUniversity of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Lynne M HowellsUniversity of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Ankur KarmokarUniversity of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Jennifer A HigginsUniversity of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Peter GreavesUniversity of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Hong CaiUniversity of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Ashley DennisonUniversity Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Matthew MetcalfeUniversity Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Giuseppe GarceaUniversity Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
David M LloydUniversity Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
David P BerryUniversity Hospitals of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
William P StewardUniversity of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Karen BrownUniversity of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
University of Leicester · GBUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust · GBUniversity Hospital of Wales · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 13101Cancer Research UK C325/A13101Cancer Research UK C325/A15575Department of HealthMedical Research Council MC_G0802524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor initiating cells (TIC) are increasingly being put forward as a potential target for intervention within colorectal cancer. Whilst characterisation and outgrowth of these cells has been extensively undertaken in primary colorectal cancers, few data are available describing characteristics within the metastatic setting. Tissue was obtained from patients undergoing surgical resection for colorectal liver metastases, and processed into single cell suspension for assessment. Tumor initiating cells from liver metastases were characterised using combinations of EPCAM, Aldehyde dehydrogenase activity, CD133 and CD26. CD133 expression was significantly lower in patients who had received chemotherapy, but this was accounted for by a decrease observed in the male patient cohort only. ALDHhigh populations were rare (0.4 and 0.3% for EPCAM+/ALDHhigh/CD133- and EPCAM+/ALDHhigh/CD133+ populations respectively) and below the limits of detection in 28% of samples. Spheroid outgrowth of metastatic tumor cells across all samples could not be readily achieved using standard spheroid-formation techniques, thus requiring further method validation to reliably propagate cells from the majority of tissues. Spheroid formation was not enhanced using additional growth factors or fibroblast co-culture, but once cells were passaged through NOD-SCID mice, spheroid formation was observed in 82% samples, accompanied by a significant increase in CD26. Order of spheroid forming ability was ALDHhigh>CD133>CD26. Samples sorted by these markers each had the ability to reform ALDHhigh, CD133 and CD26 positive populations to a similar extent, suggestive of a high degree of plasticity for each population. Ex vivo TIC models are increasingly being utilised to assess efficacy of therapeutic interventions. It is therefore essential that such investigations use well-characterised models that are able to sustain TIC populations across a large patient cohort in order that the inherent heterogeneity observed in cancer populations is maintained.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationAC133 AntigenAgedAged, 80 and overAldehyde DehydrogenaseAnimalsAntigens, CDAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCell Adhesion MoleculesCell LineCoculture TechniquesColorectal NeoplasmsDipeptidyl Peptidase 4Epithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeFemaleAC133 AntigenAldehyde DehydrogenaseAntigens, CDAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCell Adhesion MoleculesDipeptidyl Peptidase 4Epithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeGlycoproteinsPeptidesPROM1 protein, humanProm1 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID25658706
PMCPMC4319830
OpenAlexW1991851806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.