Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25658611›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Long-lasting effects of early-life antibiotic treatment and routine animal handling on gut microbiota composition and immune system in pigs.

Dirkjan Schokker, Jing Zhang, Stéphanie A Vastenhouw, Hans G H J Heilig, Hauke Smidt, Johanna M J Rebel, Mari A Smits

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Efficacy of a New Commercial Vaccine AgainstAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dirkjan SchokkerWageningen UR Livestock Research, P.O. box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Jing ZhangLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Dreijenplein 10, 6703 HB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Stéphanie A VastenhouwCentral Veterinary Institute, P.O. box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Hans G H J HeiligLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Dreijenplein 10, 6703 HB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Hauke SmidtLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Dreijenplein 10, 6703 HB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Johanna M J RebelCentral Veterinary Institute, P.O. box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Mari A SmitsWageningen UR Livestock Research, P.O. box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands; Central Veterinary Institute, P.O. box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn intensive pig husbandry systems, antibiotics are frequently administrated during early life stages to prevent respiratory and gastro-intestinal tract infections, often in combination with stressful handlings. The immediate effects of these treatments on microbial colonization and immune development have been described recently. Here we studied whether the early life administration of antibiotics has long-lasting effects on the pig's intestinal microbial community and on gut functionality. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsTo investigate the long-lasting effect of early-life treatment, piglets were divided into three different groups receiving the following treatments: 1) no antibiotics and no stress, 2) antibiotics and no stress, and 3) antibiotics and stress. All treatments were applied at day four after birth. Sampling of jejunal content for community scale microbiota analysis, and jejunal and ileal tissue for genome-wide transcription profiling, was performed at day 55 (~8 weeks) and day 176 (~25 weeks) after birth. Antibiotic treatment in combination with or without exposure to stress was found to have long-lasting effects on host intestinal gene expression involved in a multitude of processes, including immune related processes. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The results obtained in this study indicate that early life (day 4 after birth) perturbations have long-lasting effects on the gut system, both in gene expression (day 55) as well as on microbiota composition (day 176). At day 55 high variance was observed in the microbiota data, but no significant differences between treatment groups, which is most probably due to the newly acquired microbiota during and right after weaning (day 28). Based on the observed difference in gene expression at day 55, it is hypothesized that due to the difference in immune programming during early life, the systems respond differently to the post-weaning newly acquired microbiota. As a consequence, the gut systems of the treatment groups develop into different homeostasis.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiodiversityDisaccharidesDNA, BacterialGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHeterocyclic CompoundsIntestinal MucosaMacrolidesStress, PhysiologicalSus scrofaAnti-Bacterial AgentsDisaccharidesDNA, BacterialHeterocyclic CompoundsMacrolidestulathromycin

Identifiers

PMID25658611
PMCPMC4319779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.