Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25658479›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

Neural circuits for cognitive appetite control in healthy and obese individuals: an fMRI study.

Jetro J Tuulari, Henry K Karlsson, Jussi Hirvonen, Paulina Salminen, Pirjo Nuutila, Lauri Nummenmaa

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Reward responses to vicarious feeding depend on body mass index.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jetro J TuulariTurku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Henry K KarlssonTurku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Jussi HirvonenTurku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Department of Radiology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Paulina SalminenDepartment of Surgery, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Pirjo NuutilaTurku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Department of Endocrinology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Lauri NummenmaaTurku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Department of Biomedical Engineering and Computational Science, School of Science, Aalto University, Aalto, Finland; Brain Research Unit, O.V. Lounasmaa Laboratory, School of Science, Aalto University, Aalto, Finland.
Turku University Hospital · FIUniversity of Turku · FITurku PET Centre · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mere sight of foods may activate the brain's reward circuitry, and humans often experience difficulties in inhibiting urges to eat upon encountering visual food signals. Imbalance between the reward circuit and those supporting inhibitory control may underlie obesity, yet brain circuits supporting volitional control of appetite and their possible dysfunction that can lead to obesity remain poorly specified. Here we delineated the brain basis of volitional appetite control in healthy and obese individuals with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Twenty-seven morbidly obese women (mean BMI = 41.4) and fourteen age-matched normal-weight women (mean BMI = 22.6) were scanned with 1.5 Tesla fMRI while viewing food pictures. They were instructed to inhibit their urge to eat the foods, view the stimuli passively or imagine eating the foods. Across all subjects, a frontal cortical control circuit was activated during appetite inhibition versus passive viewing of the foods. Inhibition minus imagined eating (appetite control) activated bilateral precunei and parietal cortices and frontal regions spanning anterior cingulate and superior medial frontal cortices. During appetite control, obese subjects had lower responses in the medial frontal, middle cingulate and dorsal caudate nuclei. Functional connectivity of the control circuit was increased in morbidly obese versus control subjects during appetite control, which might reflect impaired integrative and executive function in obesity.

Indexed as

Appetite RegulationAdultBrain MappingCase-Control StudiesCerebral CortexCognitionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedObesity

Identifiers

PMID25658479
PMCPMC4320085
OpenAlexW2081480795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.