Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25658378›Full record

ReviewCurrent pharmaceutical biotechnology2015

Drug delivery systems for wound healing.

Noah R Johnson, Yadong Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current pharmaceutical biotechnology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Poloxamer-based hydrogel with EGCG and rhEGF for diabetic foot ulcer treatment.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Kick-Starting Wound Healing: A Review of Pro-Healing Drugs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Noah R Johnson
Yadong Wang320 Benedum Hall, 3700 O'Hara St, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA. yaw20@pitt.edu.

Funding

Cardiovascular Bioengineering Training ProgramT32HL076124 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SANJEEV G SHROFF · 2005 to 2026
$7.0M
Extended Release of Bioactive Factors to Treat Refractory WoundsR01NR016436 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WANG, YADONG · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS 2T32HL076124NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL076124NINR NIH HHS R01 NR016436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein, gene, and small molecule therapies hold great potential for facilitating comprehensive tissue repair and regeneration. However, their clinical value will rely on effective delivery systems which maximize their therapeutic benefit. Significant advances have been made in recent years towards biomaterial delivery systems to satisfy this clinical need. Here we summarize the most outstanding advances in drug delivery technology for cutaneous wound healing.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansRegenerationWound HealingBiocompatible Materials

Identifiers

PMID25658378
PMCPMC6053062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.