Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25658091›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Catching the missing million: experiences in enhancing TB & DR-TB detection by providing upfront Xpert MTB/RIF testing for people living with HIV in India.

Neeraj Raizada, Kuldeep Singh Sachdeva, Achuthan Sreenivas, Shubhangi Kulsange, Radhey Shyam Gupta, Rahul Thakur, Puneet Dewan, Catharina Boehme, Chinnambedu Nainarappan Paramsivan

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Unsuccessful XpertPublic health action · 2018
    Article
  16. Missed opportunities for earlier diagnosis of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis despite access to XpertThe international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2017
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Neeraj RaizadaFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, New Delhi, India.
Kuldeep Singh SachdevaCentral TB Division, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
Achuthan SreenivasWorld Health Organization, India Country Office, New Delhi, India.
Shubhangi KulsangeFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, New Delhi, India.
Radhey Shyam GuptaCentral TB Division, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
Rahul ThakurFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, New Delhi, India.
Puneet DewanWorld Health Organization, India Country Office, New Delhi, India.
Catharina BoehmeFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland.
Chinnambedu Nainarappan ParamsivanFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, New Delhi, India.
Government of India · INWorld Health Organization - India · INFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA critical challenge in providing TB care to People Living with HIV (PLHIV) is establishing an accurate bacteriological diagnosis. Xpert MTB/RIF, a highly sensitive and specific rapid tool, offers a promising solution in addressing these challenges. This study presents results from PLHIV taking part in a large demonstration study across India wherein upfront Xpert MTB/RIF testing was offered to all presumptive PTB cases in public health facilities.

methodThe study covered a population of 8.8 million across 18 sub-district level tuberculosis units (TU), with one Xpert MTB/RIF platform established at each TU. All HIV-infected patients suspected of TB (both TB and Drug Resistant TB (DR-TB)) accessing public health facilities in study area were prospectively enrolled and provided upfront Xpert MTB/RIF testing.

result2,787 HIV-infected presumptive pulmonary TB cases were enrolled and 867 (31.1%, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 29.4‒32.8) HIV-infected TB cases were diagnosed under the study. Overall 27.6% (CI 25.9-29.3) of HIV-infected presumptive PTB cases were positive by Xpert MTB/RIF, compared with 12.9% (CI 11.6-14.1) who had positive sputum smears. Upfront Xpert MTB/RIF testing of presumptive PTB and DR-TB cases resulted in diagnosis of 73 (9.5%, CI 7.6‒11.8) and 16 (11.2%, CI 6.7‒17.1) rifampicin resistance cases, respectively. Positive predictive value (PPV) for rifampicin resistance detection was high 97.7% (CI 89.3‒99.8), with no significant difference with or without prior history of TB treatment.

conclusionThe study results strongly demonstrate limitations of using smear microscopy for TB diagnosis in PLHIV, leading to low TB and DR-TB detection which can potentially lead to either delayed or sub-optimal TB treatment. Our findings demonstrate the usefulness and feasibility of addressing this diagnostic gap with upfront of Xpert MTB/RIF testing, leading to overall strengthening of care and support package for PLHIV.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansIndiaMaleRifampinTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantTuberculosis, PulmonaryRifampin

Identifiers

PMID25658091
PMCPMC4319843
OpenAlexW2011699240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.