Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25658053›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2015

Predicting the response of the deep-ocean microbiome to geochemical perturbations by hydrothermal vents.

Daniel C Reed, John A Breier, Houshuo Jiang, Karthik Anantharaman, Christopher A Klausmeier, Brandy M Toner, Cathrine Hancock, Kevin Speer, Andreas M Thurnherr, Gregory J Dick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Microbial invasions in sludge anaerobic digesters.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Integrating biogeochemistry with multiomic sequence information in a model oxygen minimum zone.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniel C ReedDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
John A BreierDepartment of Ocean Physics and Engineering, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, USA.
Houshuo JiangDepartment of Ocean Physics and Engineering, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, USA.
Karthik AnantharamanDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Christopher A KlausmeierKellogg Biological Station, Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI, USA.
Brandy M TonerDepartment of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Cathrine HancockGeophysical Fluid Dynamics Institute, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Kevin Speer1] Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Institute, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA [2] Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Andreas M ThurnherrDivision of Ocean and Climate Physics, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, NY, USA.
Gregory J DickDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Submarine hydrothermal vents perturb the deep-ocean microbiome by injecting reduced chemical species into the water column that act as an energy source for chemosynthetic organisms. These systems thus provide excellent natural laboratories for studying the response of microbial communities to shifts in marine geochemistry. The present study explores the processes that regulate coupled microbial-geochemical dynamics in hydrothermal plumes by means of a novel mathematical model, which combines thermodynamics, growth and reaction kinetics, and transport processes derived from a fluid dynamics model. Simulations of a plume located in the ABE vent field of the Lau basin were able to reproduce metagenomic observations well and demonstrated that the magnitude of primary production and rate of autotrophic growth are largely regulated by the energetics of metabolisms and the availability of electron donors, as opposed to kinetic parameters. Ambient seawater was the dominant source of microbes to the plume and sulphur oxidisers constituted almost 90% of the modelled community in the neutrally-buoyant plume. Data from drifters deployed in the region allowed the different time scales of metabolisms to be cast in a spatial context, which demonstrated spatial succession in the microbial community. While growth was shown to occur over distances of tens of kilometers, microbes persisted over hundreds of kilometers. Given that high-temperature hydrothermal systems are found less than 100 km apart on average, plumes may act as important vectors between different vent fields and other environments that are hospitable to similar organisms, such as oil spills and oxygen minimum zones.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAutotrophic ProcessesBacteriaHydrothermal VentsMetagenomicsModels, TheoreticalOceans and SeasSeawaterThermodynamics

Identifiers

PMID25658053
PMCPMC4511942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.