Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25657903›Full record

ArticlePerspectives in clinical research

Comparative evaluation of honey, chlorhexidine gluconate (0.2%) and combination of xylitol and chlorhexidine mouthwash (0.2%) on the clinical level of dental plaque: A 30 days randomized control trial.

Ankita Jain, Dara John Bhaskar, Devanand Gupta, Chandan Agali, Vipul Gupta, Rajendra Kumar Gupta, Priyanka Yadav, Akash B Lavate, Mudita Chaturvedi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives in clinical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparative Evaluation of 3 Commercial Mouthwash Formulations on Clinical Parameters of Chronic Gingivitis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ankita JainDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College and Research Centre, Moradabad, India.
Dara John BhaskarDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College and Research Centre, Moradabad, India.
Devanand GuptaDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, Institute of Dental Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Chandan AgaliDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College and Research Centre, Moradabad, India.
Vipul GuptaDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College and Research Centre, Moradabad, India.
Rajendra Kumar GuptaDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, Principal, Government Degree College, Banbasa, Uttrakhand, India.
Priyanka YadavDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, Rajasthan Dental College, Jaipur, India.
Akash B LavateDepartment of Orthodontics, Vasant Dada Patil Dental College, Sangli, Maharashtra, India.
Mudita ChaturvediDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Career Post-Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences & Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Teerthanker Mahaveer University · INCareer Institute Of Medical & Dental Sciences and Hospital · INRajasthan Dental College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo compare the effect of honey, chlorhexidine mouthwash and combination of xylitol chewing gum and chlorhexidine mouthwash on the dental plaque level. MATERIALS AND

methodsNinety healthy dental students, both male and female, aged between 21 to 25 years participated in the study. The subjects were randomly divided into three groups, i.e. the honey group, the chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash group and the combination of xylitol chewing gum and chlorhexidine (CHX) mouthwash group. The data was collected at the baseline, 15(th) day and 30(th) day; the plaque was disclosed using disclosing solution and their scores were recorded at six sites per tooth using the Quigley and Hein plaque index modified by Turesky-Gilmore-Glickman. Statistical analysis was carried out later to compare the effect of all the three groups. P ≤ 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

resultsOur result showed that all the three groups were effective in reducing the plaque but post-hoc LSD (Least Significant Difference) showed that honey group and chlorhexidine + xylitol group were more effective than chlorhexidine group alone. The results demonstrated a significant reduction of plaque indices in honey group and chlorhexidine + xylitol group over a period of 15 and 30 days as compared to chlorhexidine.

Indexed as

Chlorhexidinehoneyplaque indexxylitol

Identifiers

PMID25657903
PMCPMC4314848
OpenAlexW2073769570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.