ArticlePerspectives in clinical research
Evaluation of adverse drug reactions in HIV positive patients in a tertiary care hospital.
Article in Perspectives in clinical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Comparison of Active Pharmacovigilance Strategies Used to Monitor Adverse Events to Antiviral Agents: A Systematic Review.Drug safety · 2024Pooled it
- Epidemiology of Antiretroviral Therapy Related Adverse Drug Reactions and its Predictors Among Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus/AIDS in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS CarePooled it
- Determinants of adverse reactions to first-line antitubercular medicines: a prospective cohort study.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2023Article
- Correlating CD4 count with mucocutaneous manifestations in HIV-positive patients: A prospective study.Indian journal of sexually transmitted diseases and AIDSArticle
- A prospective study to estimate the incidence and pattern of adverse drug reactions to first-line antiretroviral therapy (tenofovir, efavirenz, and lamivudine).Indian journal of sexually transmitted diseases and AIDSArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextThe advancement and development of new drugs and treatment strategies increase the risk of unusual Adverse Events (AEs) in HIV patients.
aimsThe objective of our study was to assess the incidence, types and nature of AEs in HIV positive subjects. SETTINGS AND
designPatients with WHO stage IV disease irrespective of the CD4 cell count, or WHO stage III disease with a CD4 cell count <350 cell/cu. Mm, or, WHO stage I or II disease with a CD4 cell count of <200 cells/cu. mm, and on prior anti-retroviral therapy for not more than six months preceding the observation date, were included in the study. After initiation of therapy, the patients were examined for the occurrence any adverse events including the type and severity, or any other abnormal laboratory findings. Causality assessment of the adverse events was done using the Naranjo's scale.
resultsOut of 327 patients studied prospectively, 43 patients developed AEs. Out of these, 23 (53.5%) were males and 20 (46.5%) were females. A total of 53 (16.21%) AEs were reported. Antitubercular drugs caused the maximum AEs (28.3%) followed by zidovudine (20.7%), nevirapine (15.0%) and efavirenz (5.6%). Stavudine, ethambutol, sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim, and atazanavir were also responsible for 3.7% of AEs individually. Causality assessment done according to the Naranjo's scale revealed that 66.04% AEs were 'probable' and 33.96% were 'possible'.
conclusionsAnemia, hepatitis and dermatological adverse effects are the most common AEs. Antitubercular drugs contributed significantly for the incidence of AEs in these patients. Frequency of AEs was slightly more in males compared to females.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.