Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25657900›Full record

ArticlePerspectives in clinical research

Evaluation of adverse drug reactions in HIV positive patients in a tertiary care hospital.

Anshu Kumar Jha, Akash Gadgade, Ashok K Shenoy, Mukta N Chowta, John T Ramapuram

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives in clinical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anshu Kumar JhaDepartment of Pharmacology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Akash GadgadeDepartment of Pharmacology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Ashok K ShenoyDepartment of Pharmacology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Mukta N ChowtaDepartment of Pharmacology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
John T RamapuramDepartment of Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Kasturba Medical College, Manipal · INManipal Academy of Higher Education · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe advancement and development of new drugs and treatment strategies increase the risk of unusual Adverse Events (AEs) in HIV patients.

aimsThe objective of our study was to assess the incidence, types and nature of AEs in HIV positive subjects. SETTINGS AND

designPatients with WHO stage IV disease irrespective of the CD4 cell count, or WHO stage III disease with a CD4 cell count <350 cell/cu. Mm, or, WHO stage I or II disease with a CD4 cell count of <200 cells/cu. mm, and on prior anti-retroviral therapy for not more than six months preceding the observation date, were included in the study. After initiation of therapy, the patients were examined for the occurrence any adverse events including the type and severity, or any other abnormal laboratory findings. Causality assessment of the adverse events was done using the Naranjo's scale.

resultsOut of 327 patients studied prospectively, 43 patients developed AEs. Out of these, 23 (53.5%) were males and 20 (46.5%) were females. A total of 53 (16.21%) AEs were reported. Antitubercular drugs caused the maximum AEs (28.3%) followed by zidovudine (20.7%), nevirapine (15.0%) and efavirenz (5.6%). Stavudine, ethambutol, sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim, and atazanavir were also responsible for 3.7% of AEs individually. Causality assessment done according to the Naranjo's scale revealed that 66.04% AEs were 'probable' and 33.96% were 'possible'.

conclusionsAnemia, hepatitis and dermatological adverse effects are the most common AEs. Antitubercular drugs contributed significantly for the incidence of AEs in these patients. Frequency of AEs was slightly more in males compared to females.

Indexed as

Adverse eventsanti-retroviral therapyHIV

Identifiers

PMID25657900
PMCPMC4314844
OpenAlexW1963870078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.