Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25657813›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2015

High-throughput phenotyping of plant resistance to aphids by automated video tracking.

Karen J Kloth, Cindy Jm Ten Broeke, Manus Pm Thoen, Marianne Hanhart-van den Brink, Gerrie L Wiegers, Olga E Krips, Lucas Pjj Noldus, Marcel Dicke, Maarten A Jongsma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Perspectives for integrated insect pest protection in oilseed rape breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Plant Transcription Factors Involved in Drought and Associated Stresses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Karen J KlothLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands ; Laboratory of Plant Physiology, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands ; Plant Research International, Wageningen University and Research Center, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Cindy Jm Ten BroekeLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Manus Pm ThoenLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands ; Laboratory of Plant Physiology, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands ; Plant Research International, Wageningen University and Research Center, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Marianne Hanhart-van den BrinkLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Gerrie L WiegersLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands ; Plant Research International, Wageningen University and Research Center, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Olga E KripsNoldus Information Technology bv, P.O. Box 268, 6700 AG Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Lucas Pjj NoldusNoldus Information Technology bv, P.O. Box 268, 6700 AG Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Marcel DickeLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Maarten A JongsmaPlant Research International, Wageningen University and Research Center, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPiercing-sucking insects are major vectors of plant viruses causing significant yield losses in crops. Functional genomics of plant resistance to these insects would greatly benefit from the availability of high-throughput, quantitative phenotyping methods.

resultsWe have developed an automated video tracking platform that quantifies aphid feeding behaviour on leaf discs to assess the level of plant resistance. Through the analysis of aphid movement, the start and duration of plant penetrations by aphids were estimated. As a case study, video tracking confirmed the near-complete resistance of lettuce cultivar 'Corbana' against Nasonovia ribisnigri (Mosely), biotype Nr:0, and revealed quantitative resistance in Arabidopsis accession Co-2 against Myzus persicae (Sulzer). The video tracking platform was benchmarked against Electrical Penetration Graph (EPG) recordings and aphid population development assays. The use of leaf discs instead of intact plants reduced the intensity of the resistance effect in video tracking, but sufficiently replicated experiments resulted in similar conclusions as EPG recordings and aphid population assays. One video tracking platform could screen 100 samples in parallel.

conclusionsAutomated video tracking can be used to screen large plant populations for resistance to aphids and other piercing-sucking insects.

Indexed as

AphidsArabidopsisArabidopsis thalianaAutomated video trackingHost plant resistanceLactuca sativaPhenotypingPiercing-sucking insects

Identifiers

PMID25657813
PMCPMC4318543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.