Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25657585›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2015

Changes in background electroencephalography and regional cerebral glucose metabolism in focal epilepsy patients after 1-month administration of levetiracetam.

Seong Hoon Kim, Sung-Chul Lim, Woojun Kim, Oh-Hun Kwon, Chan Mi Kim, Jong-Min Lee, Young-Min Shon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Deviations from Critical Dynamics in Interictal Epileptiform Activity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seong Hoon KimDepartment of Neurology, The Catholic University of Korea, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung-Chul LimDepartment of Neurology, The Catholic University of Korea, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea ; Catholic Neuroscience Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Woojun KimDepartment of Neurology, The Catholic University of Korea, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea ; Catholic Neuroscience Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Oh-Hun KwonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chan Mi KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jong-Min LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young-Min ShonDepartment of Neurology, The Catholic University of Korea, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea ; Catholic Neuroscience Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hanyang University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The antiseizure efficacy and safety of levetiracetam (LEV) is well documented; however, few clinical studies have investigated the predictability of patient responsiveness to LEV, especially when the drug is first administered. The aim of this study was to ascertain the utility of clinical, electrophysiological, and neuroimaging parameters for assessing the early response to LEV treatment in focal epilepsy patients. Twelve confirmed focal epilepsy patients were included who had never taken LEV before. At baseline and 1 month after LEV administration, all subjects underwent 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and electroencephalography (EEG), and completed the Quality of Life in Epilepsy questionnaire (QOLIE-31). Participants were divided by drug response: good versus poor. The good response group (seven subjects) was defined by a >50% decrease in seizure frequency compared to baseline (3 months before LEV intake). The other five participants with a <50% decrease in seizure frequency were placed into the poor response group. We compared the differential changes in brain glucose metabolism on FDG-PET, power spectrum on the EEG, and QOLIE-31 results between the two groups after a 1-month LEV trial. In the good response group, it was possible to identify brain regions with increased glucose metabolism, including the bilateral caudate nuclei and both frontal and left parietal regions (uncorrected P<0.005). In the poor response group, FDG-PET did not reveal any areas with significantly increased glucose metabolism. In the good response group, spectral EEG analysis revealed decreased delta power (1-3 Hz, P<0.05) in the parietal region and increased beta1 power (13-19 Hz, P<0.05) in the frontal region, whereas no significant changes were observed in the poor response group. There were no significant changes on the QOLIE-31 in either group after a 1-month LEV trial. Our results suggest that LEV-induced glucose metabolism and EEG spectral changes may be indicative of initial drug responsiveness as early as 1 month following treatment initiation. These parameters may be useful prognostic markers of antiseizure effects caused by LEV medication or may indicate an epiphenomenon of LEV-induced changes in glucose metabolism and EEG frequency. Further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted.

Indexed as

background EEGFDG-PETpower spectral changeresponsiveness

Identifiers

PMID25657585
PMCPMC4315549
OpenAlexW2076524491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.