Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25657571›Full record

ArticleCancer informatics2014

Inferring active and prognostic ligand-receptor pairs with interactions in survival regression models.

Christina Ruggeri, Kevin H Eng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer informatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christina RuggeriDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Kevin H EngDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Funding

Two-Spirit Films in Indigenous Cancer HealthP30CA016056 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI MARK G FRATTINI · 1985 to 2026
$116.6M
RPCI-UPCI Ovarian Cancer SPOREP50CA159981 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI MOYSICH, KIRSTEN B. · 2013 to 2025
$19.6M
Informatic Methods for Differential Signaling and Immune Co-Regulatory ExpressionK01LM012100 · NLM · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI ENG, KEVIN HASEGAWA · 2015 to 2017
$502k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016056NCI NIH HHS P50 CA159981NLM NIH HHS K01 LM012100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modeling signal transduction in cancer cells has implications for targeting new therapies and inferring the mechanisms that improve or threaten a patient's treatment response. For transcriptome-wide studies, it has been proposed that simple correlation between a ligand and receptor pair implies a relationship to the disease process. Statistically, a differential correlation (DC) analysis across groups stratified by prognosis can link the pair to clinical outcomes. While the prognostic effect and the apparent change in correlation are both biological consequences of activation of the signaling mechanism, a correlation-driven analysis does not clearly capture this assumption and makes inefficient use of continuous survival phenotypes. To augment the correlation hypothesis, we propose that a regression framework assuming a patient-specific, latent level of signaling activation exists and generates both prognosis and correlation. Data from these systems can be inferred via interaction terms in survival regression models allowing signal transduction models beyond one pair at a time and adjusting for other factors. We illustrate the use of this model on ovarian cancer data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and discuss how the finding may be used to develop markers to guide targeted molecular therapies.

Indexed as

differential correlationgene expressionovarian cancersignal transductionsurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID25657571
PMCPMC4310509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.