Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25657521›Full record

ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry : JCD

A randomized control clinical trial of fissure sealant retention: Self etch adhesive versus total etch adhesive.

Nadia Aman, Farhan Reza Khan, Aisha Salim, Huma Farid

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04945382 naunknown statusnot on this map

Evaluation of the Retention of a Flowable Resin-based Sealant With Two Types of Adhesives in First Permanent Molars. A Randomized Clinical Trial in 12 Months

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational University of San Marcos, PeruRan2021 to 2022Enrolled50ConditionsCaries,Dental, Pit and Fissure Caries, Sealant DentalArmsScotchbond Universal 3M, Single Bond 3M
NCT05606874 nacompletednot on this map

Retention Rate and Caries Preventive Effect of Preheated Flowable Resin Composite Used as a Pit and Fissure Sealant Versus Conventional Resin-based Fissure Sealant in Patients With Permanent Molars With Deep Pit and Fissure Over One Year Follow up. A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2022 to 2024Enrolled28ConditionsPit and Fissure SealantArmsPre-heating of flowable resin composite used as a pit and fissure sealant., Conventional resin fissure sealant
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clinical evaluation of a surface pre-reacted glass (S-PRG) filler-containing dental sealant placed with a self-etching primer/adhesive.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2018
    Trial
  2. AnJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nadia AmanDepartment of Operative Dentistry, Foundation University Dental College, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Farhan Reza KhanOperative Dentistry, Dental Section, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Aisha SalimOperative Dentistry, Dental Section, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Huma FaridOperative Dentistry, Margalla Institute of Health Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThere are limited studies on comparison of Total etch (TE) and Self etch (SE) adhesive for placement of sealants.

aimsThe aim of the study was to compare the retention of fissure sealants placed using TE adhesive to those sealants placed using SE (seventh generation) adhesive. SETTINGS AND

designThe study was conducted in the dental section, Aga Khan University Hospital. This study was a randomized single blinded trial with a split mouth design. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study included 37 patients, 101 teeth were included in both study groups. The intervention arm was treated with SE Adhesive (Adper Easy One, 3M ESPE, US). Control arm received TE adhesive (Adper Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE, US) before sealant application. The patients were followed after 6 months for assessment of sealant retention. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Interexaminer agreement for outcome assessment was assessed by Kappa Statistics and outcome in intervention group was assessed by McNemar's test.

resultsNinety-one pairs of molar (90%) were reevaluated for sealant retention. Complete retention was 56% in TE arm and 28% in SE arm with an odds ratio (OR) of 3.7.

conclusionsSealants applied with TE adhesives show higher rate of complete sealant retention than SE adhesive.

Indexed as

Dental sealantsdentin bonding agentfissure sealantsone-step dentin bonding systempit and fissure sealants

Identifiers

PMID25657521
PMCPMC4313473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.