Draft Genome Sequences of Two Xanthomonas euvesicatoria Strains from the Balkan Peninsula.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Genome sequences of distinct genotypes of bacterial pathogen Xanthomonas euvesicatoria pv. euvesicatoria from pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) in Serbia.Access microbiology · 2026
   Article
2. Molecular Epidemiology ofMicroorganisms · 2021
   Article
3. Metagenome Profiling Identifies Potential Biocontrol Agents forGenes · 2019
   Article
4. Genomic Inference of Recombination-Mediated Evolution in Xanthomonas euvesicatoria and X. perforans.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2018
   Article
5. Whole-Genome Sequences ofFrontiers in plant science · 2016
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract