Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25656516›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2015

Automated confidence ranked classification of randomized controlled trial articles: an aid to evidence-based medicine.

Aaron M Cohen, Neil R Smalheiser, Marian S McDonagh, Clement Yu, Clive E Adams, John M Davis, Philip S Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Goals and strategies for the indexing of publication types and study designs.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Issues regarding the Indexing of Adaptive Clinical Trial Articles.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Publication Type Tagging using Transformer Models and Multi-Label Classification.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Publication Type Tagging using Transformer Models and Multi-Label Classification.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aaron M CohenDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239 USA cohenaa@ohsu.edu.
Neil R SmalheiserDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612 USA.
Marian S McDonaghDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239 USA.
Clement YuDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612 USA.
Clive E AdamsDivision of Psychiatry, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
John M DavisDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612 USA.
Philip S YuDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612 USA.

Funding

LIFE CYCLE EVENTS, PRODUCTIVITY, AND SCIENTIFIC IMPACTP01AG039347 · NIA · NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH · PI BHATTACHARYA, JAY · 2013 to 2018
$5.4M
Text Mining Pipeline to Accelerate Systematic Reviews in Evidence-Based MedicineR01LM010817 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI COHEN, AARON M., SMALHEISER, NEIL R · 2010 to 2019
$4.5M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG039347NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010817NLM NIH HHS R01LM010817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFor many literature review tasks, including systematic review (SR) and other aspects of evidence-based medicine, it is important to know whether an article describes a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Current manual annotation is not complete or flexible enough for the SR process. In this work, highly accurate machine learning predictive models were built that include confidence predictions of whether an article is an RCT. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe LibSVM classifier was used with forward selection of potential feature sets on a large human-related subset of MEDLINE to create a classification model requiring only the citation, abstract, and MeSH terms for each article.

resultsThe model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.973 and mean squared error of 0.013 on the held out year 2011 data. Accurate confidence estimates were confirmed on a manually reviewed set of test articles. A second model not requiring MeSH terms was also created, and performs almost as well. DISCUSSION: Both models accurately rank and predict article RCT confidence. Using the model and the manually reviewed samples, it is estimated that about 8000 (3%) additional RCTs can be identified in MEDLINE, and that 5% of articles tagged as RCTs in Medline may not be identified.

conclusionRetagging human-related studies with a continuously valued RCT confidence is potentially more useful for article ranking and review than a simple yes/no prediction. The automated RCT tagging tool should offer significant savings of time and effort during the process of writing SRs, and is a key component of a multistep text mining pipeline that we are building to streamline SR workflow. In addition, the model may be useful for identifying errors in MEDLINE publication types. The RCT confidence predictions described here have been made available to users as a web service with a user query form front end at: http://arrowsmith.psych.uic.edu/cgi-bin/arrowsmith_uic/RCT_Tagger.cgi.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReview Literature as TopicSupport Vector MachineEvidence-Based MedicineHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalMEDLINEROC CurveEvidence-Based MedicineInformation RetrievalNatural Language ProcessingRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSupport Vector MachinesSystematic Reviews

Identifiers

PMID25656516
PMCPMC4457112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.