ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2015
Automated confidence ranked classification of randomized controlled trial articles: an aid to evidence-based medicine.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Discovery to Verification: A Thirty-Three-Year Analysis of Research Design in Three Leading General Medical Journals, 1992-2024.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2026Article
- The landscape of artificial intelligence tools and platforms for evidence synthesis: a scoping review.Systematic reviews · 2026Article
- A Similarity Metric, Rubric and Unified Hierarchy for Biomedical Publication Types and Study Designs.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- A similarity metric, rubric, and unified hierarchy for biomedical publication types and study designs.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026Article
- Goals and strategies for the indexing of publication types and study designs.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026Article
- Mass spectrometry-based proteomics of FFPE tissues: progress, limitations, and clinical translation barriers.Clinical proteomics · 2025Review
- StudyTypeTeller-Large language models to automatically classify research study types for systematic reviews.Research synthesis methods · 2025Article
- Enhancing automated indexing of publication types and study designs in biomedical literature using full-text features.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Issues regarding the Indexing of Adaptive Clinical Trial Articles.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Publication Type Tagging using Transformer Models and Multi-Label Classification.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Machine learning for identifying randomised controlled trials when conducting systematic reviews: Development and evaluation of its impact on practice.Research synthesis methods · 2025Article
- Automation of systematic reviews of biomedical literature: a scoping review of studies indexed in PubMed.Systematic reviews · 2024Article
- How to optimize the systematic review process using AI tools.JCPP advances · 2024Review
- COVID-19-related research data availability and quality according to the FAIR principles: A meta-research study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Insights into the nutritional prevention of macular degeneration based on a comparative topic modeling approach.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Publication Type Tagging using Transformer Models and Multi-Label Classification.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
- Bat4RCT: A suite of benchmark data and baseline methods for text classification of randomized controlled trials.PloS one · 2023Article
- Machine learning algorithms to identify cluster randomized trials from MEDLINE and EMBASE.Systematic reviews · 2022Article
- Evaluation of publication type tagging as a strategy to screen randomized controlled trial articles in preparing systematic reviews.JAMIA open · 2022Article
- Automation of Article Selection Process in Systematic Reviews Through Artificial Neural Network Modeling and Machine Learning: Protocol for an Article Selection Model.JMIR research protocols · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveFor many literature review tasks, including systematic review (SR) and other aspects of evidence-based medicine, it is important to know whether an article describes a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Current manual annotation is not complete or flexible enough for the SR process. In this work, highly accurate machine learning predictive models were built that include confidence predictions of whether an article is an RCT. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe LibSVM classifier was used with forward selection of potential feature sets on a large human-related subset of MEDLINE to create a classification model requiring only the citation, abstract, and MeSH terms for each article.
resultsThe model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.973 and mean squared error of 0.013 on the held out year 2011 data. Accurate confidence estimates were confirmed on a manually reviewed set of test articles. A second model not requiring MeSH terms was also created, and performs almost as well. DISCUSSION: Both models accurately rank and predict article RCT confidence. Using the model and the manually reviewed samples, it is estimated that about 8000 (3%) additional RCTs can be identified in MEDLINE, and that 5% of articles tagged as RCTs in Medline may not be identified.
conclusionRetagging human-related studies with a continuously valued RCT confidence is potentially more useful for article ranking and review than a simple yes/no prediction. The automated RCT tagging tool should offer significant savings of time and effort during the process of writing SRs, and is a key component of a multistep text mining pipeline that we are building to streamline SR workflow. In addition, the model may be useful for identifying errors in MEDLINE publication types. The RCT confidence predictions described here have been made available to users as a web service with a user query form front end at: http://arrowsmith.psych.uic.edu/cgi-bin/arrowsmith_uic/RCT_Tagger.cgi.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.