Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25656513›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2015

Supporting interoperability of genetic data with LOINC.

Jamalynne Deckard, Clement J McDonald, Daniel J Vreeman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genomics and electronic health record systems.Human molecular genetics · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. AMIA--Setting the Standard.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jamalynne DeckardRegenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA jkdeckar@regenstrief.org.
Clement J McDonaldLister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Daniel J VreemanRegenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Funding

National Biomedical Information ServicesZIHLM200888 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI PALTOO, DINA · 2009 to 2025
$5200.7M
NLM's Personal Health Record and Consumer Service R&DZIALM008925 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI MCDONALD, CLEMENT · 2009 to 2020
$11.8M
PHS HHS HHSN276201400138PPHS HHS HHSN276201400239PPHS HHS HSN2762008000006C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic reporting of genetic testing results is increasing, but they are often represented in diverse formats and naming conventions. Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) is a vocabulary standard that provides universal identifiers for laboratory tests and clinical observations. In genetics, LOINC provides codes to improve interoperability in the midst of reporting style transition, including codes for cytogenetic or mutation analysis tests, specific chromosomal alteration or mutation testing, and fully structured discrete genetic test reporting. LOINC terms follow the recommendations and nomenclature of other standards such as the Human Genome Organization Gene Nomenclature Committee's terminology for gene names. In addition to the narrative text they report now, we recommend that laboratories always report as discrete variables chromosome analysis results, genetic variation(s) found, and genetic variation(s) tested for. By adopting and implementing data standards like LOINC, information systems can help care providers and researchers unlock the potential of genetic information for delivering more personalized care.

Indexed as

Clinical Laboratory Information SystemsGenetic TestingLogical Observation Identifiers Names and CodesClinical CodingGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetic TechniquesHumansLaboratoriesClinical laboratory information systemscontrolledGeneticsLOINCMedical records systemsVocabulary

Identifiers

PMID25656513
PMCPMC5566197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.