Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25656361›Full record

ReviewParasitology2015

Signatures of adaptation to plant parasitism in nematode genomes.

David McK Bird, John T Jones, Charles H Opperman, Taisei Kikuchi, Etienne G J Danchin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Parasitology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Genomic and Transcriptomic Analysis of the Polyploidy Cyst Nematode,International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Controlling ofSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David McK BirdBioinformatics Research Center, NC State Univ,Raleigh, NC 27695,USA.
John T JonesJames Hutton Institute,Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA,UK.
Charles H OppermanPlant Nematode Genetics Group, Dept. of Plant Pathology,NC State Univ,Raleigh, NC 27695,USA.
Taisei KikuchiDivision of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine,University of Miyazaki,Miyazaki 889-1692,Japan.
Etienne G J DanchinINRA, UMR 1355, Institut Sophia Agrobiotech,F-06903, Sophia-Antipolis,France.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-parasitic nematodes cause considerable damage to global agriculture. The ability to parasitize plants is a derived character that appears to have independently emerged several times in the phylum Nematoda. Morphological convergence to feeding style has been observed, but whether this is emergent from molecular convergence is less obvious. To address this, we assess whether genomic signatures can be associated with plant parasitism by nematodes. In this review, we report genomic features and characteristics that appear to be common in plant-parasitic nematodes while absent or rare in animal parasites, predators or free-living species. Candidate horizontal acquisitions of parasitism genes have systematically been found in all plant-parasitic species investigated at the sequence level. Presence of peptides that mimic plant hormones also appears to be a trait of plant-parasitic species. Annotations of the few genomes of plant-parasitic nematodes available to date have revealed a set of apparently species-specific genes on every occasion. Effector genes, important for parasitism are frequently found among those species-specific genes, indicating poor overlap. Overall, nematodes appear to have developed convergent genomic solutions to adapt to plant parasitism.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalGenomicsHost-Parasite InteractionsAnimalsNematodaPhylogenyPlantsconvergence

Identifiers

PMID25656361
PMCPMC4413825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.