Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25656228›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2015

Labour induction with prostaglandins: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Zarko Alfirevic, Edna Keeney, Therese Dowswell, Nicky J Welton, Sofia Dias, Leanne V Jones, Kate Navaratnam, Deborah M Caldwell

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zarko AlfirevicCentre for Women's Health Research, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK zarko@liv.ac.uk.
Edna KeeneySchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
Therese DowswellCentre for Women's Health Research, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK.
Nicky J WeltonSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
Sofia DiasSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
Leanne V JonesCentre for Women's Health Research, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK.
Kate NavaratnamCentre for Women's Health Research, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK.
Deborah M CaldwellSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
University of Bristol · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0802413Medical Research Council G0902118Medical Research Council MR/K023233/1Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the effectiveness and safety of prostaglandins used for labour induction.

designSystematic review with Bayesian network meta-analysis DATA SOURCES: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Database of Trials (which incorporates the results of a broad generic search for all pregnancy and postpartum trials). Sources included are CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, CINAHL, relevant journals, conference proceedings, and registries of ongoing trials. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Randomised clinical trials of prostaglandin or prostaglandin analogues used for third trimester cervical ripening or labour induction versus placebo or no treatment, alternative prostaglandin dose or administration, or a different type of prostaglandin. We included studies recruiting women with a viable fetus, but had no other restrictions relating to indication for labour induction or language of publication. Outcomes assessed were serious neonatal morbidity (trialist defined) or perinatal death; serious maternal morbidity (trialist defined) or death; vaginal delivery not achieved within 24 hours, caesarean section, and uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes.

results280 randomised clinical trials were included (48 068 women) in the review. Maternal and neonatal mortality and serious morbidity were rarely reported and are summarized narratively. Unresolved inconsistency was observed for the hyperstimulation outcome. Relative to placebo, the odds of failing to achieve a vaginal delivery were lowest for vaginal misoprostol (≥50 µg) (odds ratio 0.06 (95% credible interval 0.02 to 0.12)), with a 39% absolute probability of event (95% credible interval 1% to 94%). Compared with placebo, odds of caesarean section were lowest for titrated oral misoprostol solution (<50 µg) (odds ratio 0.65 (0.49 to 0.83)), with an absolute probability of event of 15% (3% to 40%).

conclusionsLow dose(<50 µg) titrated oral misoprostol solution had the lowest probability of caesarean section, whereas vaginal misprostol (≥50 µg) had the highest probability of achieving a vaginal delivery within 24 hours. These findings have important implications for a series of current national and international guidelines for induction of labour and future research in this area. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 2013:CRD42013005116.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLabor, InducedPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnancy Trimester, ThirdProstaglandinsProstaglandins

Identifiers

PMID25656228
PMCPMC4353287
OpenAlexW2137145593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.