ArticleBMC geriatrics2015
What should we know about dementia in the 21st century? A Delphi consensus study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Psychometric validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the dementia knowledge assessment Scale-Thai (DKAS-Thai).BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Measures Determining Dementia-Related Attitudes in Adolescents: A Scoping Review.Journal of intergenerational relationships · 2024Article
- An Assessment of Dementia Knowledge and Its Associated Factors Among Health College Students in Saudi Arabia.Cureus · 2023Article
- "I Hope That the People Caring for Me Know About Me": Exploring Person-Centred Care and the Quality of Dementia Care.Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ · 2022Article
- Dementia is (not) a natural part of ageing: a cross-sectional study on dementia knowledge and misconceptions in Swiss and Italian young adults, adults, and older adults.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Assessment of dementia knowledge and its associated factors among final year medical undergraduates in selected universities across Malaysia.BMC geriatrics · 2022Article
- Relational Design for Dementia and Job Significance (ReDeSign): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of an online dementia training for retail workers.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2022Article
- What do health professionals need to know about young onset dementia? An international Delphi consensus study.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Earlier initiation of palliative care in the disease trajectory of people living with dementia: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Myo-Inositol Levels in the Dorsal Hippocampus Serve as Glial Prognostic Marker of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Mice.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Article
- The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis and Alzheimer's Disease: Neuroinflammation Is to Blame?Nutrients · 2020Review
- Workshops on diagnosis and management of dementia for general practitioners: a pre-post intervention study of dementia knowledge.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Dementia and Parkinson's Disease: Similar and Divergent Challenges in Providing Palliative Care.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Review
- Building dementia knowledge globally through the Understanding Dementia Massive Open Online Course (MOOC).NPJ science of learning · 2019Article
- The Improving Outcomes of UTI Management in Long-Term Care Project (IOU) Consensus Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Uncomplicated Cystitis in Nursing Home Residents.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2018Article
- Dementia knowledge assessment scale (DKAS): confirmatory factor analysis and comparative subscale scores among an international cohort.BMC geriatrics · 2017Article
- End-of-life care in a psychiatric hospital.BJPsych bulletin · 2016Article
- Encountering aged care: a mixed methods investigation of medical students' clinical placement experiences.BMC geriatrics · 2016Article
- Increased self-efficacy: the experience of high-intensity exercise of nursing home residents with dementia - a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEscalating numbers of people are experiencing dementia in many countries. With increasing consumer needs, there is anticipated growth in the numbers of people providing diagnostic evaluations, treatments, and care. Ensuring a consistent and contemporary understanding of dementia across all of these groups has become a critical issue. This study aimed to reach consensus among dementia experts from English speaking countries regarding essential and contemporary knowledge about dementia.
methodsAn online Delphi study was conducted to examine expert opinion concerning dementia knowledge with three rounds of data collection. A sample of dementia experts was selected by a panel of Australian experts, including a geriatrician and three professors of aged care. Purposive selection was initially undertaken with the sample expanded through snowballing. Dementia experts (N = 19) included geriatricians, psychologists, psychiatrists, neuroscientists, dementia advocates, and nurse academics from the United Kingdom, United States, and Australia. In the first round, these participants provided open-ended responses to questions determining what comprised essential knowledge about dementia. In the second round, responses were summarised into 66 discrete statements that participants rated on the basis of importance. In the third round, a rank-ordered list of the 66 statements and a group median were provided and participants rated the statements again. The degree of consensus regarding importance ratings was determined by assessing median, interquartile range, and proportion of experts scoring above predetermined thresholds. Correlation scores were calculated for each statement after the final round to identify changes in statement scores.
resultsThe Delphi experts identified 36 statements about dementia that they considered essential to understanding the condition. Statements about care for a person experiencing dementia and their care giver represented the largest response category. Other statements, for which full or very high consensus was reached, related to dementia characteristics, symptoms and progression, diagnosis and assessment, and treatment and prevention.
conclusionsThese results summarise knowledge of dementia that is considered essential across expert representatives of key stakeholder groups from three countries. This information has implications for the delivery of care to people with the condition and the development of dementia education programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.