Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25655804›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2015

Rocking media over ex vivo corneas improves this model and allows the study of the effect of proinflammatory cytokines on wound healing.

Pallavi Deshpande, Ílida Ortega, Farshid Sefat, Virender S Sangwan, Nicola Green, Frederik Claeyssens, Sheila MacNeil

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Exploring interspecies differences inJournal of medical microbiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Stem Cell Niche Microenvironment: Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ex vivo rabbit and human corneas as models for bacterial and fungal keratitis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2017
    Article
  12. 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 inhibits corneal wound healing in an ex-vivo mouse model.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pallavi DeshpandeDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Kroto Research Institute, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Ílida OrtegaDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Kroto Research Institute, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Farshid SefatDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Kroto Research Institute, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Virender S SangwanSudhakar and Sreekanth Ravi Stem Cell Laboratory, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, LV Prasad Marg, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Nicola GreenDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Kroto Research Institute, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Frederik ClaeyssensDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Kroto Research Institute, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Sheila MacNeilDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Kroto Research Institute, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
University of Sheffield · GBL V Prasad Eye Institute · IN

Funding

Wellcome Trust 091128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this work was to develop an in vitro cornea model to study the effect of proinflammatory cytokines on wound healing.

methodsInitial studies investigated how to maintain the ex vivo models for up to 4 weeks without loss of epithelium. To study the effect of cytokines, corneas were cultured with the interleukins IL-17A, IL-22, or a combination of IL-17A and IL-22, or lipopolysaccharide (LPS). The effect of IL-17A on wound healing was then examined.

resultsWith static culture conditions, organ cultures deteriorated within 2 weeks. With gentle rocking of media over the corneas and carbon dioxide perfusion, the ex vivo models survived for up to 4 weeks without loss of epithelium. The cytokine that caused the most damage to the cornea was IL-17A. Under static conditions, wound healing of the central corneal epithelium occurred within 9 days, but only a single-layered epithelium formed whether the cornea was exposed to IL-17A or not. With rocking of media gently over the corneas, a multilayered epithelium was achieved 9 days after wounding. In the presence of IL-17A, however, there was no wound healing evident. Characterization of the cells showed that wherever epithelium was present, both differentiated cells and highly proliferative cells were present.

conclusionsWe propose that introducing rocking to extend the effective working life of this model and the introduction of IL-17A to this model to induce aspects of inflammation extend its usefulness to study the effects of agents that influence corneal regeneration under normal and inflamed conditions.

Indexed as

Culture MediaCulture TechniquesAnimalsCorneaEpithelium, CornealInterleukin-17Interleukin-22InterleukinsLipopolysaccharidesOrgan Culture TechniquesRabbitsRegenerationWound HealingCulture MediaInterleukin-17Interleukin-22InterleukinsLipopolysaccharidescornea organ cultureinflammationwound healing

Identifiers

PMID25655804
PMCPMC4349110
OpenAlexW2082505463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.