ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2015
Effect of a stable Angiotensin-(1-7) analogue on progenitor cell recruitment and cardiovascular function post myocardial infarction.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comorbidities and clinical complications associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection: an overview.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023Review
- Biosynthesis of lanthionine-constrained agonists of G protein-coupled receptors.Biochemical Society transactions · 2020Review
- Phase II Trial of Angiotensin-(1-7) for the Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Sarcoma.Sarcoma · 2016Article
- Angiotensin-(1-7): new perspectives in atherosclerosis treatment.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAngiotensin-(1-7) improves cardiac function and remodeling after myocardial infarction (MI). This may involve recruitment of hematopoietic progenitor cells that support angiogenesis. However, angiotensin-(1-7) is rapidly metabolized in plasma and tissue. The authors investigated in mice the effect of a metabolically stable angiotensin-(1-7) analogue, cyclic angiotensin-(1-7), on progenitor cell recruitment and on the heart post MI, when given in the angiogenesis phase of remodeling. METHODS AND
resultsAngiogenic progenitor cell recruitment was measured by using flow cytometry 24 and 72 hours after a daily bolus injection of cyclic angiotensin-(1-7) in healthy C57BL/6 mice. Further, mice underwent MI or sham surgery and subsequently received saline or 2 different doses of cyclic angiotensin-(1-7) for 3 or 9 weeks. Cyclic angiotensin-(1-7) increased circulating hematopoietic progenitor cells at 24 hours but not 72 hours. Post MI, cyclic angiotensin-(1-7) diminished cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and reduced myogenic tone, without altering cardiovascular function or cardiac histology at 9 weeks. Importantly, cyclic angiotensin-(1-7)-treated mice had reduced cardiac capillary density at 3 weeks after MI but not after 9 weeks. Finally, cyclic angiotensin-(1-7) decreased tube formation by cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells.
conclusionsOur results suggest that cyclic angiotensin-(1-7), when given early after MI, recruits progenitor cells but does not lead to improved angiogenesis, most likely because it simultaneously exerts antiangiogenic effect in adult endothelial cells. Apparently, optimal treatment with cyclic angiotensin-(1-7) depends on the time point of onset of application after MI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.