Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25655446›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2015

Comparing cerebrovascular reactivity measured using BOLD and cerebral blood flow MRI: The effect of basal vascular tension on vasodilatory and vasoconstrictive reactivity.

Sheliza Halani, Jonathan B Kwinta, Ali M Golestani, Yasha B Khatamian, J Jean Chen

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Cerebrovascular reactivity delay measured by blood oxygen level dependent magnetic resonance imaging and gas challenges: A systematic review.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Parkinson's disease cerebrovascular reactivity pattern: A feasibility study.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. COJournal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Cerebrovascular Reactivity Following Spinal Cord Injury.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  18. Examining the role of dopamine in methylphenidate's effects on resting brain function.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sheliza HalaniRotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre, Canada.
Jonathan B KwintaRotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Canada.
Ali M GolestaniRotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre, Canada.
Yasha B KhatamianRotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre, Canada.
J Jean ChenRotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: jchen@research.baycrest.org.
Baycrest Hospital · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

CIHR 126164-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) is an important metric of cerebrovascular health. While the BOLD fMRI method in conjunction with carbon-dioxide (CO2) based vascular manipulation has been the most commonly used, the BOLD signal is not a direct measure of vascular changes, and the use of arterial-spin labeling (ASL) cerebral blood flow (CBF) imaging is increasingly advocated. Nonetheless, given the differing dependencies of BOLD and CBF on vascular baseline conditions and the diverse CO2 manipulation types currently used in the literature, knowledge of potential biases introduced by each technique is critical for the interpretation of CVR measurements. In this work, we use simultaneous BOLD-CBF acquisitions during both vasodilatory (hypercapnic) and vasoconstrictive (hypocapnic) stimuli to measure CVR. We further imposed different levels of baseline vascular tension by inducing hypercapnic and hypocapnic baselines, separately from normocapnia by 4mmHg. We saw significant and diverse dependencies on vascular stimulus and baseline condition in both BOLD and CBF CVR measurements: (i) BOLD-based CVR is more sensitive to basal vascular tension than CBF-based CVR; (ii) the use of a combination of vasodilatory and vasoconstrictive stimuli maximizes the sensitivity of CBF-based CVR to vascular tension changes; (iii) the BOLD and CBF vascular response delays are both significantly lengthened at predilated baseline. As vascular tension can often be altered by potential pathology, our findings are important considerations when interpreting CVR measurements in health and disease.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCerebrovascular CirculationFemaleHumansHypercapniaHypocapniaImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOxygenVasoconstrictionVasodilationYoung AdultOxygenArterial-spin labeling (ASL)Blood-oxygenation level-dependent signal (BOLD)Cerebral blood flow (CBF)Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR)HypercapniaHypocapniaProspective targetingVasoconstrictionVasodilation

Identifiers

PMID25655446
PMCPMC5167565
OpenAlexW1967578708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.