ArticleInternational journal of hematology2015
Third allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) using unrelated cord blood for relapsed acute leukemia after second allogeneic SCT.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Third HLA-haploidentical stem cell transplantation using post-transplant cyclophosphamide for relapsed acute leukemia.Bone marrow transplantation · 2023Article
- Outcomes of third allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in relapsed/refractory acute leukemia after a second transplantation.Bone marrow transplantation · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We analyzed the results of third allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT3) using single-unit unrelated cord blood (CB) in seven adult patients with relapsed acute leukemia after second allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT2). The median age at SCT 3 was 44 years (range 20-58 years). The patients had de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (n = 4), secondary AML following myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 2), and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n = 1). Four patients received myeloablative conditioning, and three received reduced-intensity conditioning. All but one patient had myeloid reconstitution with remission, but five patients relapsed even after SCT3. However, one patient is alive and disease-free 6 years after SCT3, which is the longest remission duration among three allogeneic SCTs she received. Furthermore, actual survival after relapse of SCT 2 was significantly better for patients who received SCT3 compared with institutional control patients who never received SCT3 (P < 0.001). These results suggest that the use of CB may allow the opportunity to perform SCT3 in patients who have experienced relapsed leukemia without donors, and SCT3 with CB may offer the chance of durable remission for selected patients with relapsed acute leukemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.